th e impact of Europeanisation on the conduct of the oral hearing in administrative proceedings (in particular in relation to infraction proceedings) .

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73636317" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73636317 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

th e impact of Europeanisation on the conduct of the oral hearing in administrative proceedings (in particular in relation to infraction proceedings) .

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Th is chapter aims to analyse the possibilities and limits of using videoconferencing in administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic. Th e basicresearch question is whether and under what conditions videoconferencingcan be considered a procedurally admissible and constitutionally acceptablemethod of conducting oral proceedings. Th is question is followed by othersub-questions: how can videoconferencing ensure respect for the principlesof immediacy, publicity and equality of participants in proceedings; whatguarantees must be provided by law to prevent the procedural rights of participants from being curtailed; and fi nally, whether, from the point of viewof the legal system, it is more appropriate to have a general regulation allowing videoconferencing with the possibility of exceptions laid down by speciallaws, or, on the contrary, to maintain the current model, where their use isregulated only on a case-by-case basis. Th e aim of the text is to provide a basis for de lege ferenda considerations on the general incorporation of videoconferencing into Czech administrative law

Název v anglickém jazyce

th e impact of Europeanisation on the conduct of the oral hearing in administrative proceedings (in particular in relation to infraction proceedings) .

Popis výsledku anglicky

Th is chapter aims to analyse the possibilities and limits of using videoconferencing in administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic. Th e basicresearch question is whether and under what conditions videoconferencingcan be considered a procedurally admissible and constitutionally acceptablemethod of conducting oral proceedings. Th is question is followed by othersub-questions: how can videoconferencing ensure respect for the principlesof immediacy, publicity and equality of participants in proceedings; whatguarantees must be provided by law to prevent the procedural rights of participants from being curtailed; and fi nally, whether, from the point of viewof the legal system, it is more appropriate to have a general regulation allowing videoconferencing with the possibility of exceptions laid down by speciallaws, or, on the contrary, to maintain the current model, where their use isregulated only on a case-by-case basis. Th e aim of the text is to provide a basis for de lege ferenda considerations on the general incorporation of videoconferencing into Czech administrative law

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: PURPOSES, PROCEDURES AND PEOPLE

ISBN

978-80-7502-853-2

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

232-254

Počet stran knihy

440

Název nakladatele

Leges

Místo vydání

Praha

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—