Putin on Trial: Personal Immunities before the International Criminal Court

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73636262" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73636262 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Putin on Trial: Personal Immunities before the International Criminal Court

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The contribution concerns an exception from the jurisdictional framework of the ICC or rather the extent of jurisdiction ratione personae. The chapter analyses available case law of the ICC concerning the applicability of personal immunities in proceedings before it and assesses possible prospect of its usage in recent or eventual future cases before the ICC. The author presents critical stance against the conclusion of the Appeals Chamber adopted in the Al-Bashir that personal immunities disappear in the proceedings before the ICC due to existence of the respective rule of customary international law, which is allegedly codifiedin Article 27(2) of the Rome Statute. The chapter explores the possible paths to disregard personal immunity of troika members coming from the third states (non-state parties to the Rome Statute) and admits that the removal of immunity might stem from a Security Council resolution, once it is expressly provided in such a resolution. Otherwise, it aims at the customary international law path - not yet established - which might be nevertheless brought about by dynamic (i.e. not merely deductive) creation of customary international law and assesses also a possibility to remove the personal immunity through application of circumstances precludingwrongfulness, namely the self-defence.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Putin on Trial: Personal Immunities before the International Criminal Court

Popis výsledku anglicky

The contribution concerns an exception from the jurisdictional framework of the ICC or rather the extent of jurisdiction ratione personae. The chapter analyses available case law of the ICC concerning the applicability of personal immunities in proceedings before it and assesses possible prospect of its usage in recent or eventual future cases before the ICC. The author presents critical stance against the conclusion of the Appeals Chamber adopted in the Al-Bashir that personal immunities disappear in the proceedings before the ICC due to existence of the respective rule of customary international law, which is allegedly codifiedin Article 27(2) of the Rome Statute. The chapter explores the possible paths to disregard personal immunity of troika members coming from the third states (non-state parties to the Rome Statute) and admits that the removal of immunity might stem from a Security Council resolution, once it is expressly provided in such a resolution. Otherwise, it aims at the customary international law path - not yet established - which might be nevertheless brought about by dynamic (i.e. not merely deductive) creation of customary international law and assesses also a possibility to remove the personal immunity through application of circumstances precludingwrongfulness, namely the self-defence.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Prosecution of War Crimes before the ICC: Achievements and Challenges

ISBN

978-3-031-84215-3

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

29-45

Počet stran knihy

212

Název nakladatele

Palgrave Macmillan

Místo vydání

Cham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—