Swinburne's A Priori Case from Perfect Love for the Trinity: A Reconstruction and the Obstacle of All-Perfection

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F13%3A33146347" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/13:33146347 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Swinburne's A Priori Case from Perfect Love for the Trinity: A Reconstruction and the Obstacle of All-Perfection

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This is a philosophical study of an a priori argument by Richard Swinburne for a version of the Trinity doctrine. The case is a priori roughly in the sense of proceeding apart from any revelation. Its premise, argued by Swinburne elsewhere and not discussed here, is theism, stated thus: exactly one uncaused divine individual exists. The conclusion is the (so called) functional Trinity doctrine: exactly three divine individuals exist, interdependent in action and existence. The paper explores how this doctrine is supposed to follow from theism. After laying out the concepts of a divine individual and of the said interdependence amongst divine individuals, the gist of Swinburne's case is identified. Salient in it are the following claims: perfect love can only happen between at least two equals; perfect love can only happen between two equals if they co-operate in sharing their goods with yet another equal; any fourth or further divine individual cannot provide any additional kind of goo

Název v anglickém jazyce

Swinburne's A Priori Case from Perfect Love for the Trinity: A Reconstruction and the Obstacle of All-Perfection

Popis výsledku anglicky

This is a philosophical study of an a priori argument by Richard Swinburne for a version of the Trinity doctrine. The case is a priori roughly in the sense of proceeding apart from any revelation. Its premise, argued by Swinburne elsewhere and not discussed here, is theism, stated thus: exactly one uncaused divine individual exists. The conclusion is the (so called) functional Trinity doctrine: exactly three divine individuals exist, interdependent in action and existence. The paper explores how this doctrine is supposed to follow from theism. After laying out the concepts of a divine individual and of the said interdependence amongst divine individuals, the gist of Swinburne's case is identified. Salient in it are the following claims: perfect love can only happen between at least two equals; perfect love can only happen between two equals if they co-operate in sharing their goods with yet another equal; any fourth or further divine individual cannot provide any additional kind of goo

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.30.0041" target="_blank" >EE2.3.30.0041: Podpora vytváření excelentních výzkumných týmů a intersektorální mobility na Univerzitě Palackého v Olomouci II.</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pantheon

ISSN

1803-2443

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

58-78

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—