Fuzzy consensus in group decision-making model using absolute-type evaluations

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F18%3A73589289" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/18:73589289 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://mme2018.fm.vse.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/MME2018-Electronic_proceedings.pdf" target="_blank" >https://mme2018.fm.vse.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/MME2018-Electronic_proceedings.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Fuzzy consensus in group decision-making model using absolute-type evaluations

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the paper, we consider the fuzzy group decision-making model, which has been introduced in recent years. An absolute-type evaluation of alternatives is used in this model. This evaluation express the degree of fulfillment of the given goal by the respective alternative. This model is based on the idea that an optimal alternative is chosen from the subset of alternatives, which are sufficiently good (user-defined) according to enough (userdefined) important (user-defined) experts. In the other words, we drop out alternatives which are evaluated very well by some important experts but according to other important experts are evaluated bad. On the contrary, we introduce a different approach to determine the strength of the consensus than in the original model. It turned out that the new approach can form a different subset of sufficiently consensual alternatives. This fact is illustrated by an example.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Fuzzy consensus in group decision-making model using absolute-type evaluations

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the paper, we consider the fuzzy group decision-making model, which has been introduced in recent years. An absolute-type evaluation of alternatives is used in this model. This evaluation express the degree of fulfillment of the given goal by the respective alternative. This model is based on the idea that an optimal alternative is chosen from the subset of alternatives, which are sufficiently good (user-defined) according to enough (userdefined) important (user-defined) experts. In the other words, we drop out alternatives which are evaluated very well by some important experts but according to other important experts are evaluated bad. On the contrary, we introduce a different approach to determine the strength of the consensus than in the original model. It turned out that the new approach can form a different subset of sufficiently consensual alternatives. This fact is illustrated by an example.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10102 - Applied mathematics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

36th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics

ISBN

978-80-7378-371-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

neuvedeno

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

527-532

Název nakladatele

MatFyzPress, MFF Univerzity Karlovy

Místo vydání

Praha

Místo konání akce

Jindřichův Hradec

Datum konání akce

12. 9. 2018

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—