On sustainability interpretations of the Ecological Footprint
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F20%3A73603813" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/20:73603813 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091930518X" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091930518X</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106543" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106543</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
On sustainability interpretations of the Ecological Footprint
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper focuses on using the Ecological Footprint concept for sustainability assessment. The Ecological Footprint is a popular indicator of human use of environmental resources and is commonly presented at the country level by comparing the consumption footprint with territorial biocapacity, with a negative balance implying unsustainability. This constrains a country's consumption by its biocapacity but allows its stock of resources to be depleted if they are not associated with domestic consumption. This paper argues that this approach is legitimate but should not automatically constitute a default framework for interpretation. Two perspectives on entitlements to environmental resources are analyzed and, based on them, a novel approach to sustainability assessment is proposed. The paper further discusses the links between national sustainability and the related issues of self-sufficiency, consumption, and responsibility.
Název v anglickém jazyce
On sustainability interpretations of the Ecological Footprint
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper focuses on using the Ecological Footprint concept for sustainability assessment. The Ecological Footprint is a popular indicator of human use of environmental resources and is commonly presented at the country level by comparing the consumption footprint with territorial biocapacity, with a negative balance implying unsustainability. This constrains a country's consumption by its biocapacity but allows its stock of resources to be depleted if they are not associated with domestic consumption. This paper argues that this approach is legitimate but should not automatically constitute a default framework for interpretation. Two perspectives on entitlements to environmental resources are analyzed and, based on them, a novel approach to sustainability assessment is proposed. The paper further discusses the links between national sustainability and the related issues of self-sufficiency, consumption, and responsibility.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
ISSN
0921-8009
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
169
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
MAR
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
"106543-1"-"106543-10"
Kód UT WoS článku
000510953600048
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85075934731