Comparison of the extrinsic and intrinsic visualization methods: Explorative eye-tracking analysis;
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F22%3A73613796" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/22:73613796 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14210/20:00114610
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://iccgis2020.cartography-gis.com/8ICCGIS-Vol1/8ICCGIS_Proceedings_Vol1_2020.pdf" target="_blank" >https://iccgis2020.cartography-gis.com/8ICCGIS-Vol1/8ICCGIS_Proceedings_Vol1_2020.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of the extrinsic and intrinsic visualization methods: Explorative eye-tracking analysis;
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of the study is to identify the differences between the cognitive processes underlying different map-reading tasks. An eye-tracking study was designed based on our previous research. We hypothesized that significant differences may occur when utilizing two different methods of presenting two phenomena in one map (i.e. bivariate scales). Specifically, the extrinsic and intrinsic methods will be compared using two different types of tasks: The participants will be presented with maps that provide information on soil moisture and soil depth, and will be asked to identify the areas that meet the required conditions (e.g. area with the highest soil moisture and low soil depth). The research sample will consist of university students of humanities and social sciences, for it is our intention to focus on the people with no significant cartographic experience. In order to explore the collected eye-tracking data, an explorative analysis will be used. The main objective of the analysis will be to find out whether either of the bivariate scales requires more saccades to accomplish the task, requires more direct transitions between the legend and the map, and whether the different visualization types induce different cognitive processing methods. Our results will shed some light on the topic of computational (non)equivalence of the extrinsic and intrinsic visualization methods. The presented study will provide a basis for the upcoming cross-cultural research. The paper presents the suggested experimental design of the research and the means of analysis.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of the extrinsic and intrinsic visualization methods: Explorative eye-tracking analysis;
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of the study is to identify the differences between the cognitive processes underlying different map-reading tasks. An eye-tracking study was designed based on our previous research. We hypothesized that significant differences may occur when utilizing two different methods of presenting two phenomena in one map (i.e. bivariate scales). Specifically, the extrinsic and intrinsic methods will be compared using two different types of tasks: The participants will be presented with maps that provide information on soil moisture and soil depth, and will be asked to identify the areas that meet the required conditions (e.g. area with the highest soil moisture and low soil depth). The research sample will consist of university students of humanities and social sciences, for it is our intention to focus on the people with no significant cartographic experience. In order to explore the collected eye-tracking data, an explorative analysis will be used. The main objective of the analysis will be to find out whether either of the bivariate scales requires more saccades to accomplish the task, requires more direct transitions between the legend and the map, and whether the different visualization types induce different cognitive processing methods. Our results will shed some light on the topic of computational (non)equivalence of the extrinsic and intrinsic visualization methods. The presented study will provide a basis for the upcoming cross-cultural research. The paper presents the suggested experimental design of the research and the means of analysis.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
8th International Conference on Cartography and GIS Proceedings Vol. 1
ISBN
—
ISSN
1314-0604
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
42-48
Název nakladatele
Bulgarian Cartographic Association
Místo vydání
Sofia
Místo konání akce
Nessebar
Datum konání akce
20. 6. 2022
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000853257000004