Are human categories formal concepts? A case study using Dutch data
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F24%3A73627225" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/24:73627225 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/03081079.2024.2311917" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/03081079.2024.2311917</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2024.2311917" target="_blank" >10.1080/03081079.2024.2311917</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Are human categories formal concepts? A case study using Dutch data
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
While the notion of a formal concept, as used in formal concept analysis, is inspired by the traditional view of human concepts, the psychological relevance of formal concepts has not been examined in the past. In this paper, we provide an experimental exploration of the psychological plausibility of formal concepts as human categories. For this purpose, we use the currently most extensive available psychological data regarding human categories. The data involve several human categories, over 400 exemplars of these categories, several hundreds of binary attributes that describe these exemplars and several binary matrices representing which exemplars have which attributes. Our primary question is: Are human categories formal concepts? That is, do the involved human categories represent formal concepts in the respective exemplar-attribute binary matrices? In most of the examined instances, the answer to this question turns out affirmative. This supports the hypothesis that formal concepts provide a psychologically plausible model of human categories. In addition, we discuss several related questions, provide observations on the psychological data used and present topics for future exploration.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Are human categories formal concepts? A case study using Dutch data
Popis výsledku anglicky
While the notion of a formal concept, as used in formal concept analysis, is inspired by the traditional view of human concepts, the psychological relevance of formal concepts has not been examined in the past. In this paper, we provide an experimental exploration of the psychological plausibility of formal concepts as human categories. For this purpose, we use the currently most extensive available psychological data regarding human categories. The data involve several human categories, over 400 exemplars of these categories, several hundreds of binary attributes that describe these exemplars and several binary matrices representing which exemplars have which attributes. Our primary question is: Are human categories formal concepts? That is, do the involved human categories represent formal concepts in the respective exemplar-attribute binary matrices? In most of the examined instances, the answer to this question turns out affirmative. This supports the hypothesis that formal concepts provide a psychologically plausible model of human categories. In addition, we discuss several related questions, provide observations on the psychological data used and present topics for future exploration.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS
ISSN
0308-1079
e-ISSN
1563-5104
Svazek periodika
53
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7-8
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
50
Strana od-do
755-804
Kód UT WoS článku
001196132500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85189560136