Healthy vaccinee effect in practice
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F24%3A73627549" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/24:73627549 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mp.pl/paim/issue/article/16750/" target="_blank" >https://www.mp.pl/paim/issue/article/16750/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16750" target="_blank" >10.20452/pamw.16750</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Healthy vaccinee effect in practice
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We would like to thank Pietrzak et al for responding to our commentary on their original paper on COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness. In our letter, using data from the Czech Republic, we showed that the population opting for vaccination was generally healthier than the unvaccinated one, which causes a significant selection bias and makes any calculation of vaccine effectiveness problematic. In their response, Pietrzak et al asked us for an explanation of a seemingly strange phenomenon, namely, that there was virtually no difference in all-cause mortality (ACM) among the unvaccinated individuals aged 50 to 79 years between the low- and high-COVID periods. This is actually an excellent point demonstrating the importance of careful interpretation of the data and how big a role the selection bias could play. We explain this in our current letter.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Healthy vaccinee effect in practice
Popis výsledku anglicky
We would like to thank Pietrzak et al for responding to our commentary on their original paper on COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness. In our letter, using data from the Czech Republic, we showed that the population opting for vaccination was generally healthier than the unvaccinated one, which causes a significant selection bias and makes any calculation of vaccine effectiveness problematic. In their response, Pietrzak et al asked us for an explanation of a seemingly strange phenomenon, namely, that there was virtually no difference in all-cause mortality (ACM) among the unvaccinated individuals aged 50 to 79 years between the low- and high-COVID periods. This is actually an excellent point demonstrating the importance of careful interpretation of the data and how big a role the selection bias could play. We explain this in our current letter.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10103 - Statistics and probability
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Polish Archives of Internal Medicine-Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej
ISSN
0032-3772
e-ISSN
1897-9483
Svazek periodika
134
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
3
Strana od-do
3
Kód UT WoS článku
001272986300015
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85194520760