Comparison of Automatic, Manual and Real User Experience Based Testing of Accessibility of Web Sites for Persons with Visual Impairment

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F15%3A33158384" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/15:33158384 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Automatic, Manual and Real User Experience Based Testing of Accessibility of Web Sites for Persons with Visual Impairment

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this paper is to compare different models of accessibility evaluation of websites. It describes various aspects of automatic, manual and user based forms of accessibility evaluation the context of visual impairment. Automatic analysis of accessibility implemented with the use of special programs brings exact evaluation findings based on the source code, style sheets, scripts, and other parts of the website. We found that the exactness of these findings does correspond with the real-life results based on actual accessibility experienced by persons with visual disabilities. The presented results of individual researches show a big variance in conformity with automatic and manual evaluation. The discrepancies in the conclusions of automated andmanual forms of testing in 2008 we recorded in 41% of web sites. In 2013 on a sample of 135 web sites we recorded noticed significant differences in the conclusions of the 34% of analyzed web sites. This proves that model of manual acces

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Automatic, Manual and Real User Experience Based Testing of Accessibility of Web Sites for Persons with Visual Impairment

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this paper is to compare different models of accessibility evaluation of websites. It describes various aspects of automatic, manual and user based forms of accessibility evaluation the context of visual impairment. Automatic analysis of accessibility implemented with the use of special programs brings exact evaluation findings based on the source code, style sheets, scripts, and other parts of the website. We found that the exactness of these findings does correspond with the real-life results based on actual accessibility experienced by persons with visual disabilities. The presented results of individual researches show a big variance in conformity with automatic and manual evaluation. The discrepancies in the conclusions of automated andmanual forms of testing in 2008 we recorded in 41% of web sites. In 2013 on a sample of 135 web sites we recorded noticed significant differences in the conclusions of the 34% of analyzed web sites. This proves that model of manual acces

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AM - Pedagogika a školství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP14-33854P" target="_blank" >GP14-33854P: e-Přístupnost pro studenty se zrakovým postižením na vysokých školách v České a Slovenské republice</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Exceptional People

ISSN

1805-4978

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

1

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

117-123

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—