Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Systematic Review And (Aystematic) Scoping Review: Similarities Or Differences?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F19%3A73595460" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/19:73595460 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333175346" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333175346</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Systematic Review And (Aystematic) Scoping Review: Similarities Or Differences?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    A scoping review is perceived in the family of systematic reviews as a type of brief information retrieval strategy. A systematic review (as an autonomous and prized strategy) is used to provide provisional results. In many cases, a published scoping review is the first step for processing e.g. a qualitative synthesis. However, it may be confusing to designate a study type as a &quot;systematic scoping review&quot;, which inexperienced researchers can understand as a combination of a systematic and scoping review. A scoping review, however, has some similarities to, and at the same time differences from, a systematic review. Common features can be seen in the same phases of their elaboration, in the use of a research question, and in the work with studies (research, knowledge) – both types of reviews are in the same group, of the “review of literature” procedure. However, the nature and purpose of the research question remains a dominant difference. While the scoping review asks “What has already been published?”, “Where is the research gap”, “What literature (studies) is available on the topic and problem?”, etc., systematic reviews are considered a critical assessment strategy and an evaluation of the studies found that have met demanding criteria and precise work with the results, and thus provide valuable interpretations for providing information on current practice.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Systematic Review And (Aystematic) Scoping Review: Similarities Or Differences?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    A scoping review is perceived in the family of systematic reviews as a type of brief information retrieval strategy. A systematic review (as an autonomous and prized strategy) is used to provide provisional results. In many cases, a published scoping review is the first step for processing e.g. a qualitative synthesis. However, it may be confusing to designate a study type as a &quot;systematic scoping review&quot;, which inexperienced researchers can understand as a combination of a systematic and scoping review. A scoping review, however, has some similarities to, and at the same time differences from, a systematic review. Common features can be seen in the same phases of their elaboration, in the use of a research question, and in the work with studies (research, knowledge) – both types of reviews are in the same group, of the “review of literature” procedure. However, the nature and purpose of the research question remains a dominant difference. While the scoping review asks “What has already been published?”, “Where is the research gap”, “What literature (studies) is available on the topic and problem?”, etc., systematic reviews are considered a critical assessment strategy and an evaluation of the studies found that have met demanding criteria and precise work with the results, and thus provide valuable interpretations for providing information on current practice.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Proceedings of IAC in Dresden 2019

  • ISBN

    978-80-88203-13-1

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    5

  • Strana od-do

    73-77

  • Název nakladatele

    Czech Institute of Academic Education, z.s.

  • Místo vydání

    Praha

  • Místo konání akce

    Dresden

  • Datum konání akce

    25. 10. 2019

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku