Validation of NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses at Postoperative Intensive Care Unit: Quasi-Experimental Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F21%3A73606408" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/21:73606408 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/issue/pielxxiw/20/1" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/issue/pielxxiw/20/1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2021-0006" target="_blank" >10.2478/pielxxiw-2021-0006</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Validation of NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses at Postoperative Intensive Care Unit: Quasi-Experimental Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim. 1. Implement repeated validation of three NANDA International nursing diagnoses before and after their experimental classifi cation in daily nursing practice at an intensive care unit for adults, at a medium-sized hospital. 2. Identify statistically significant differences in Diagnostic Content Validation (DCV) values between the two validations. Material and methods. Fehring’s DCV model was used for validation of NANDA International diagnoses. The sample of assessors consisted of 33 experts in the fi rst stage and of 31 experts in the second stage, the experts were in both cases ICU nurses. Nursing diagnoses were experimentally applied in practice for 3 months. The data were processed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon matched pairs test and paired t-test. Results. Total DCV scores of diagnoses after the fi rst validation: Impaired gas exchange 00030 with DCV 0.67; Risk for disuse syndrome 00040 with DCV 0.69 and Risk for aspiration 00039 with DCV 0.73. The DCV values after the second validation were as follows: 0.63; 0.64 and 0.78 respectively.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Validation of NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses at Postoperative Intensive Care Unit: Quasi-Experimental Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim. 1. Implement repeated validation of three NANDA International nursing diagnoses before and after their experimental classifi cation in daily nursing practice at an intensive care unit for adults, at a medium-sized hospital. 2. Identify statistically significant differences in Diagnostic Content Validation (DCV) values between the two validations. Material and methods. Fehring’s DCV model was used for validation of NANDA International diagnoses. The sample of assessors consisted of 33 experts in the fi rst stage and of 31 experts in the second stage, the experts were in both cases ICU nurses. Nursing diagnoses were experimentally applied in practice for 3 months. The data were processed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon matched pairs test and paired t-test. Results. Total DCV scores of diagnoses after the fi rst validation: Impaired gas exchange 00030 with DCV 0.67; Risk for disuse syndrome 00040 with DCV 0.69 and Risk for aspiration 00039 with DCV 0.73. The DCV values after the second validation were as follows: 0.63; 0.64 and 0.78 respectively.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30307 - Nursing

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pielęgniarstwo XXI wieku

ISSN

2450-646X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

20

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

5-9

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85101352872