Attitude-Based Multi-expert Evaluation of Design

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F22%3A73617961" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/22:73617961 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989592:15210/22:73617961

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Attitude-Based Multi-expert Evaluation of Design

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Evaluation is an important part of any design, construction or engineering process. The selection of the most appropriate form can prove crucial for the success of the product or solution that is being designed or developed. The selection of criteria, their measurability and the ability to estimate future values of some criteria can influence the result of the evaluation, as well as the definition of the overall goal and the selection of evaluators. Apart from measurable criteria, also emotions and attitudes can play an important role in the success of the final solution. This paper suggests an adaptation of the interval-valued semantic differential method proposed by Stoklasa et al. in 2019 for the purpose of design evaluation. We discuss the process of design evaluation using this tool and suggest its use in multi-expert evaluation setting. We propose a definition of consensus in this context, discuss the issue of the ease of achieving consensus, and suggest an approach that can provide information on the level of agreement of the evaluators in terms of the evaluation expressed as a object in the semantic space. We also suggest a methodology for the selection of the best design based on the aggregated multi-expert evaluations.Keywords

Název v anglickém jazyce

Attitude-Based Multi-expert Evaluation of Design

Popis výsledku anglicky

Evaluation is an important part of any design, construction or engineering process. The selection of the most appropriate form can prove crucial for the success of the product or solution that is being designed or developed. The selection of criteria, their measurability and the ability to estimate future values of some criteria can influence the result of the evaluation, as well as the definition of the overall goal and the selection of evaluators. Apart from measurable criteria, also emotions and attitudes can play an important role in the success of the final solution. This paper suggests an adaptation of the interval-valued semantic differential method proposed by Stoklasa et al. in 2019 for the purpose of design evaluation. We discuss the process of design evaluation using this tool and suggest its use in multi-expert evaluation setting. We propose a definition of consensus in this context, discuss the issue of the ease of achieving consensus, and suggest an approach that can provide information on the level of agreement of the evaluators in terms of the evaluation expressed as a object in the semantic space. We also suggest a methodology for the selection of the best design based on the aggregated multi-expert evaluations.Keywords

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50204 - Business and management

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Intelligent Systems and Applications in Business and Finance

ISBN

978-3-030-93699-0

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

1-16

Počet stran knihy

216

Název nakladatele

Springer

Místo vydání

Cham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—