Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F24%3A73630174" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/24:73630174 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2024/03000/common_tool_structures_and_approaches_to_risk_of.5.aspx?context=latestarticles" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2024/03000/common_tool_structures_and_approaches_to_risk_of.5.aspx?context=latestarticles</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00463" target="_blank" >10.11124/JBIES-23-00463</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

There are numerous tools available to assess the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review. These tools have different structures, including scales and checklists, which may or may not separate their items by domains. There are also various approaches and guides for the process, scoring, and interpretation of risk of bias assessments, such as value judgments, quality scores, and relative ranks. The objective of this commentary, which is part of the JBI Series on Risk of Bias, is to discuss some of the distinctions among different tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment and the implications of these approaches for systematic reviewers.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers

Popis výsledku anglicky

There are numerous tools available to assess the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review. These tools have different structures, including scales and checklists, which may or may not separate their items by domains. There are also various approaches and guides for the process, scoring, and interpretation of risk of bias assessments, such as value judgments, quality scores, and relative ranks. The objective of this commentary, which is part of the JBI Series on Risk of Bias, is to discuss some of the distinctions among different tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment and the implications of these approaches for systematic reviewers.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30302 - Epidemiology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

ISSN

2689-8381

e-ISSN

2689-8381

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

389-393

Kód UT WoS článku

001233194300014

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85187781155