Pelvic floor muscle training during the childbirth period: a best practice implementation project

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F25%3A73635851" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/25:73635851 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/25:00143833

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/abstract/2025/01001/pelvic_floor_muscle_training_during_the_childbirth.3.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/abstract/2025/01001/pelvic_floor_muscle_training_during_the_childbirth.3.aspx</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000495" target="_blank" >10.1097/XEB.0000000000000495</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Pelvic floor muscle training during the childbirth period: a best practice implementation project

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction:In the UK, the Royal College of Midwives and the Chartered Society for Physiotherapy advocate that women undertake early and effective pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during the childbirth period to reduce the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). Objectives:This project sought to assess and improve midwives&apos; compliance with best practice recommendations for PFMT in a UK NHS maternity service, with the goal of improving PFMT for women. Methods:This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and JBI&apos;s best practice recommendations for PFMT. Following a baseline audit of midwives&apos; practice, the results were considered. The JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach was used to identify barriers and facilitators to improve compliance with recommendations. A follow-up audit was undertaken after the development of a revised continuing professional development (CPD) program for midwives on PFMT. Results:The results showed improved compliance with all four audit criteria. Criterion 1 (midwives&apos; engagement with PFMT) increased from 76% to 92%; Criterion 2 (PFMT during the antenatal period) rose from 50% to 92%; Criterion 3 (postnatal risk assessment for UI) rose from 45% to 67%; and Criterion 4 (PFMT for high-risk women during the postnatal period) increased from 49% to 92%. Conclusion:Whilst this study presented some challenges in implementing evidence-based initiatives in a UK NHS maternity service, it also demonstrated that an audit approach can overcome these, thereby improving compliance with best practices. In this case, changes to a CPD PFMT program increased midwives&apos; compliance with evidence-based practice criteria. In the future, when implementing change in the NHS system, consideration should be given to organizational and leadership factors. Further audits will need to be carried out to monitor practice and effect change. Spanish abstract:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A322

Název v anglickém jazyce

Pelvic floor muscle training during the childbirth period: a best practice implementation project

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction:In the UK, the Royal College of Midwives and the Chartered Society for Physiotherapy advocate that women undertake early and effective pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during the childbirth period to reduce the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). Objectives:This project sought to assess and improve midwives&apos; compliance with best practice recommendations for PFMT in a UK NHS maternity service, with the goal of improving PFMT for women. Methods:This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and JBI&apos;s best practice recommendations for PFMT. Following a baseline audit of midwives&apos; practice, the results were considered. The JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach was used to identify barriers and facilitators to improve compliance with recommendations. A follow-up audit was undertaken after the development of a revised continuing professional development (CPD) program for midwives on PFMT. Results:The results showed improved compliance with all four audit criteria. Criterion 1 (midwives&apos; engagement with PFMT) increased from 76% to 92%; Criterion 2 (PFMT during the antenatal period) rose from 50% to 92%; Criterion 3 (postnatal risk assessment for UI) rose from 45% to 67%; and Criterion 4 (PFMT for high-risk women during the postnatal period) increased from 49% to 92%. Conclusion:Whilst this study presented some challenges in implementing evidence-based initiatives in a UK NHS maternity service, it also demonstrated that an audit approach can overcome these, thereby improving compliance with best practices. In this case, changes to a CPD PFMT program increased midwives&apos; compliance with evidence-based practice criteria. In the future, when implementing change in the NHS system, consideration should be given to organizational and leadership factors. Further audits will need to be carried out to monitor practice and effect change. Spanish abstract:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A322

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50302 - Education, special (to gifted persons, those with learning disabilities)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION

ISSN

2691-3321

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Supplement 1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

"S19"-"S26"

Kód UT WoS článku

001457378200005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105002818625