Introducing multidisciplinary ward rounds in Malawi: a best practice implementation project

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F25%3A73635852" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/25:73635852 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/25:00143835

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/abstract/2025/01001/introducing_multidisciplinary_ward_rounds_in.5.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/abstract/2025/01001/introducing_multidisciplinary_ward_rounds_in.5.aspx</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000443" target="_blank" >10.1097/XEB.0000000000000443</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Introducing multidisciplinary ward rounds in Malawi: a best practice implementation project

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction:The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) in the United Kingdom advocate the use of structured multidisciplinary team (MDT) ward rounds since they can enable safe, effective, improved care and enhanced staff satisfaction.Objectives:This project sought to implement best practices for MDT ward rounds in a male medical ward in a hospital in Malawi.Methods:The project was conducted in line with the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit of MDT ward rounds was conducted with six staff members. Audit criteria consisted of ten best practices, as recommended by JBI, the RCP, and the RCN. Stakeholder meetings were held to review the baseline audit results and highlight areas of non-compliance. JBI&apos;s Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool was used to identify barriers to compliance with best practices, and a follow-up audit was conducted to determine changes in practice.Results:The results only showed improvement for one criterion, which rose from 33% to 100% (n=6) where nurses attended the ward round.Conclusions:This study demonstrated some challenges in evidence implementation projects and how these can, in part, be overcome. While the results only demonstrated improvement for one criterion, this paper shows how audits can be used to promote best practice, which in this case resulted in nurses being more involved in ward rounds, improvements in MDT communication, enhanced nurse inclusion in decision-making and, consequently, patient care.Spanish abstract:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A233

Název v anglickém jazyce

Introducing multidisciplinary ward rounds in Malawi: a best practice implementation project

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction:The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) in the United Kingdom advocate the use of structured multidisciplinary team (MDT) ward rounds since they can enable safe, effective, improved care and enhanced staff satisfaction.Objectives:This project sought to implement best practices for MDT ward rounds in a male medical ward in a hospital in Malawi.Methods:The project was conducted in line with the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit of MDT ward rounds was conducted with six staff members. Audit criteria consisted of ten best practices, as recommended by JBI, the RCP, and the RCN. Stakeholder meetings were held to review the baseline audit results and highlight areas of non-compliance. JBI&apos;s Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool was used to identify barriers to compliance with best practices, and a follow-up audit was conducted to determine changes in practice.Results:The results only showed improvement for one criterion, which rose from 33% to 100% (n=6) where nurses attended the ward round.Conclusions:This study demonstrated some challenges in evidence implementation projects and how these can, in part, be overcome. While the results only demonstrated improvement for one criterion, this paper shows how audits can be used to promote best practice, which in this case resulted in nurses being more involved in ward rounds, improvements in MDT communication, enhanced nurse inclusion in decision-making and, consequently, patient care.Spanish abstract:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A233

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50302 - Education, special (to gifted persons, those with learning disabilities)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION

ISSN

2691-3321

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Supplement 1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

"S35"-"S43"

Kód UT WoS článku

001457378200004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85200743400