Výška podélné nožní klenby stanovená metodou Chippaux-Šmiřák u kompenzovaných a nekompenzovaných typů nohy dle Roota

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F08%3A00006461" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/08:00006461 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The height of the longitudinal foot arch assessed by Chippaux-Šmiřák index in the compensated and uncompesated foot types according to Root

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It is known that functional types and subtypes of foot according to Root differ, among others, by the height of foot arch when load applied. The study objective was to use Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI) to evaluate the height of longitudinal foot arch in functional (sub)types according to Root. The test group consisted from 141 women (17-85 y., x=58.8, SD=12) and 87 men (22-86 y., x=58.7, SD=11.91), mainly middle aged and older. One examiner assessed the foot types and subtypes in all test subjects- rearfoot varus compensated (RFvarC), partially compensated (RFvarP) and uncompensated (RFvarN), forefoot varus compensated (FFvarC), partially compensated (FFvarP) and uncompensated (FFvarN), forefoot valgus flexible (FFvalgF), semiflexible (FFvalgS) and rigid(FFvalgR) and neutral foot (N). The other examiner evaluated all footprints and he assessed CSI. The sequence was determined on basis of average CSI; significance of the differences we found was tested by ANOVA and post-hoc Fisher LSD te

Název v anglickém jazyce

The height of the longitudinal foot arch assessed by Chippaux-Šmiřák index in the compensated and uncompesated foot types according to Root

Popis výsledku anglicky

It is known that functional types and subtypes of foot according to Root differ, among others, by the height of foot arch when load applied. The study objective was to use Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI) to evaluate the height of longitudinal foot arch in functional (sub)types according to Root. The test group consisted from 141 women (17-85 y., x=58.8, SD=12) and 87 men (22-86 y., x=58.7, SD=11.91), mainly middle aged and older. One examiner assessed the foot types and subtypes in all test subjects- rearfoot varus compensated (RFvarC), partially compensated (RFvarP) and uncompensated (RFvarN), forefoot varus compensated (FFvarC), partially compensated (FFvarP) and uncompensated (FFvarN), forefoot valgus flexible (FFvalgF), semiflexible (FFvalgS) and rigid(FFvalgR) and neutral foot (N). The other examiner evaluated all footprints and he assessed CSI. The sequence was determined on basis of average CSI; significance of the differences we found was tested by ANOVA and post-hoc Fisher LSD te

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica

ISSN

1212-1185

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

38

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—