Case C-454/06, Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur v Austria -- legal and economic aspects. Solutions for public administration?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F13%3A00212118" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/13:00212118 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361040967" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361040967</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361040967" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun201361040967</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Case C-454/06, Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur v Austria -- legal and economic aspects. Solutions for public administration?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The overall question of when amendments to an existing agreement are to be regarded as constituting a new award of a public contract has not come before the ECJ. The Pressetext case and decision's practice in the Czech Republic has solved this question:In order to ensure transparency of procedures and equal treatment of tenderers, amendments to provisions of a public contract during the currency of the contract constitute a new award of a contract ... when they are materially different in character from the original contract and, therefore, are such as to demonstrate the intention of the parties to renegotiate the essential terms of that contract." We can say that for this purpose an amendment to a public contract may be regarded as 'material' when: it introduces conditions which, had they been part of the initial award procedure, would have allowed for the admission of tenderers other than those initially admitted, or would have allowed for the acceptance of a tender other than the o

Název v anglickém jazyce

Case C-454/06, Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur v Austria -- legal and economic aspects. Solutions for public administration?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The overall question of when amendments to an existing agreement are to be regarded as constituting a new award of a public contract has not come before the ECJ. The Pressetext case and decision's practice in the Czech Republic has solved this question:In order to ensure transparency of procedures and equal treatment of tenderers, amendments to provisions of a public contract during the currency of the contract constitute a new award of a contract ... when they are materially different in character from the original contract and, therefore, are such as to demonstrate the intention of the parties to renegotiate the essential terms of that contract." We can say that for this purpose an amendment to a public contract may be regarded as 'material' when: it introduces conditions which, had they been part of the initial award procedure, would have allowed for the admission of tenderers other than those initially admitted, or would have allowed for the acceptance of a tender other than the o

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

ISSN

1211-8516

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

61

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

967-971

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—