Does social distrust always lead to a stronger support for government intervention?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F15%3A43888115" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/15:43888115 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0258-7" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0258-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0258-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11127-015-0258-7</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Does social distrust always lead to a stronger support for government intervention?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper considers 'trust' as an empirical determinant of individual support for government intervention. The central notion is that the influence of generalized trust on policy attitudes is conditional on confidence in both state actors and major companies. The starting point is the idea that individuals who generally distrust other persons have a stronger taste for the regulation of economic activities, while people with high interpersonal trust are in favor of less stringent regulatory control. Yet,people who do not trust unknown others also tend to mistrust government and private companies. If mistrust in state actors dominates, we should not necessarily expect stronger interventionist preferences. Estimating the determinants of interventionist attitudes using data from the World Values Survey/European Values Study for approximately 130,000 individuals in forty OECD- and EU-countries, we find evidence that the impact of social trust on government intervention attitudes is conditi
Název v anglickém jazyce
Does social distrust always lead to a stronger support for government intervention?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper considers 'trust' as an empirical determinant of individual support for government intervention. The central notion is that the influence of generalized trust on policy attitudes is conditional on confidence in both state actors and major companies. The starting point is the idea that individuals who generally distrust other persons have a stronger taste for the regulation of economic activities, while people with high interpersonal trust are in favor of less stringent regulatory control. Yet,people who do not trust unknown others also tend to mistrust government and private companies. If mistrust in state actors dominates, we should not necessarily expect stronger interventionist preferences. Estimating the determinants of interventionist attitudes using data from the World Values Survey/European Values Study for approximately 130,000 individuals in forty OECD- and EU-countries, we find evidence that the impact of social trust on government intervention attitudes is conditi
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AD - Politologie a politické vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/7E12049" target="_blank" >7E12049: Welfare, Wealth and Work for Europe</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Public Choice
ISSN
0048-5829
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
163
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3-4
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
355-377
Kód UT WoS článku
000354407500009
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—