"Almost Equal": Confronting Norms and Normality in Experiencing Visual Disability

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F21%3A43918178" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/21:43918178 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520945364" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520945364</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0896920520945364" target="_blank" >10.1177/0896920520945364</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

"Almost Equal": Confronting Norms and Normality in Experiencing Visual Disability

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article examines the everyday experience of visually disabled people with norms and normality and confronts it with three approaches discussed in disability studies: (i) the medical model, (ii) the social model, and (iii) critical disability studies. The most available model to the people in the study, as well as the most widespread approach in Czech society, is the medical model. However, the text shows that although other approaches are rather marginal, their logic is present in the everyday experience of the communication partners in the research. They can espouse the rigid, medical model, while, at the same time, confronting the construction of norms that both the social model and critical disability studies defy. This finding reveals both the normative and subversive character of disability, manifested in visually impaired experience.

Název v anglickém jazyce

"Almost Equal": Confronting Norms and Normality in Experiencing Visual Disability

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article examines the everyday experience of visually disabled people with norms and normality and confronts it with three approaches discussed in disability studies: (i) the medical model, (ii) the social model, and (iii) critical disability studies. The most available model to the people in the study, as well as the most widespread approach in Czech society, is the medical model. However, the text shows that although other approaches are rather marginal, their logic is present in the everyday experience of the communication partners in the research. They can espouse the rigid, medical model, while, at the same time, confronting the construction of norms that both the social model and critical disability studies defy. This finding reveals both the normative and subversive character of disability, manifested in visually impaired experience.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-03708S" target="_blank" >GA20-03708S: Geografie znevýhodnění: nevidomá zkušenost s urbánním prostorem</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Critical Sociology

ISSN

0896-9205

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

47

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7-8

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

1331-1347

Kód UT WoS článku

000557429800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85089147436