Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F23%3A43924230" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/23:43924230 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/47813059:19510/23:A0000487

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.01" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.01</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.01" target="_blank" >10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.01</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article examines the recognition and compensation of non-material damage to legal entities by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Both courts acknowledge the moral dimension of legal entities, addressing non-material damage that is inherently intertwined with these entities and challenging to quantify. While neither court provides a precise definition of non-material damage, this ambiguity enables adaptable interpretations tailored to specific cases. The absence of a comprehensive definition results in a lack of a singular criterion for determining compensation amounts, given the multifaceted nature of non-material damage encompassing subjective and objective elements. Legal entities primarily seek compensation for harm to goodwill and associated intellectual property issues, as well as the frustration stemming from prolonged legal proceedings. The divergence between the CJEU and ECHR becomes evident in the awarded compensation, with the latter typically granting amounts four times smaller. This discrepancy can be attributed to the CJEU&apos;s focus on economic competition-related claims involving substantial sums. Notably, the analysis of court decisions reveals an escalating trend in cases related to non-material damage compensation for legal entities, particularly since 2010.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article examines the recognition and compensation of non-material damage to legal entities by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Both courts acknowledge the moral dimension of legal entities, addressing non-material damage that is inherently intertwined with these entities and challenging to quantify. While neither court provides a precise definition of non-material damage, this ambiguity enables adaptable interpretations tailored to specific cases. The absence of a comprehensive definition results in a lack of a singular criterion for determining compensation amounts, given the multifaceted nature of non-material damage encompassing subjective and objective elements. Legal entities primarily seek compensation for harm to goodwill and associated intellectual property issues, as well as the frustration stemming from prolonged legal proceedings. The divergence between the CJEU and ECHR becomes evident in the awarded compensation, with the latter typically granting amounts four times smaller. This discrepancy can be attributed to the CJEU&apos;s focus on economic competition-related claims involving substantial sums. Notably, the analysis of court decisions reveals an escalating trend in cases related to non-material damage compensation for legal entities, particularly since 2010.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Juridical Tribune

ISSN

2247-7195

e-ISSN

2248-0382

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

331-345

Kód UT WoS článku

001090715000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85175245065