Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F12%3A00189010" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/12:00189010 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67179843:_____/12:00384072

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this study, the performance of nine widely used and accessible crop growth simulation models (APES-ACE, CROPSYST, DAISY, DSSAT-CERES, FASSET, HERMES, MONICA, STICS and WOFOST) was compared during 44 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) at seven sites in Northern and Central Europe. The aims of this model comparison were to examine how different process-based crop models perform at multiple sites across Europe when applied with minimal information for model calibration of spring barley at field scale, whether individual models perform better than the multi-model mean, and what the uncertainty ranges are in simulated grain yields. The reasons for differences among the models and how results for barley compare to winter wheat are discussed. Regarding yield estimation, best performing based on the root mean square error (RMSE) were models HERMES, MONICA and WOFOST with lowest values of 1124, 1282 and 1325 (kg ha1), respectively. Applying the index of agreement (IA), mod

Název v anglickém jazyce

Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this study, the performance of nine widely used and accessible crop growth simulation models (APES-ACE, CROPSYST, DAISY, DSSAT-CERES, FASSET, HERMES, MONICA, STICS and WOFOST) was compared during 44 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) at seven sites in Northern and Central Europe. The aims of this model comparison were to examine how different process-based crop models perform at multiple sites across Europe when applied with minimal information for model calibration of spring barley at field scale, whether individual models perform better than the multi-model mean, and what the uncertainty ranges are in simulated grain yields. The reasons for differences among the models and how results for barley compare to winter wheat are discussed. Regarding yield estimation, best performing based on the root mean square error (RMSE) were models HERMES, MONICA and WOFOST with lowest values of 1124, 1282 and 1325 (kg ha1), respectively. Applying the index of agreement (IA), mod

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GC - Pěstování rostlin, osevní postupy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Field Crops Research

ISSN

0378-4290

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

133

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

23-36

Kód UT WoS článku

305497300003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—