What is more suitable for kohlrabi fertilization - Digestate or mineral fertilizers?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F15%3A43907435" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/15:43907435 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/62156489:43310/15:43907435
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2015063030787.pdf" target="_blank" >http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2015063030787.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563030787" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun201563030787</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
What is more suitable for kohlrabi fertilization - Digestate or mineral fertilizers?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In a one-year vegetation pot experiment, we compared the effect of digestate from a biogas station and mineral fertilisers on yield and quality parameters of kohlrabi, variety Moravia. Four treatments were used in the trial: 1) untreated control, 2) urea, 3) digestate, 4) urea, triple superphosphate, KCl, MgSO4. The N dose was the same in treatments 2-4, 1.5 g N/pot. In treatment 4 the P, K and Mg doses corresponded to those supplied in the digestate treatment (3). The weight of single kohlrabi bulbs inthe unfertilised control was signifi cantly lower (39.2%) than in the urea treatment (100%) and the other fertilised treatments. After application of digestate (treatment 3) and mineral fertilisers (treatment 4), the weight of single bulbs significantlyincreased by 18.6 and 25.2%, respectively, compared with the urea treatment (2). The content of ascorbic acid did not diff er among the all four treatments (274-291 mg/kg). There were signifi cant diff erences between all fertilised trea
Název v anglickém jazyce
What is more suitable for kohlrabi fertilization - Digestate or mineral fertilizers?
Popis výsledku anglicky
In a one-year vegetation pot experiment, we compared the effect of digestate from a biogas station and mineral fertilisers on yield and quality parameters of kohlrabi, variety Moravia. Four treatments were used in the trial: 1) untreated control, 2) urea, 3) digestate, 4) urea, triple superphosphate, KCl, MgSO4. The N dose was the same in treatments 2-4, 1.5 g N/pot. In treatment 4 the P, K and Mg doses corresponded to those supplied in the digestate treatment (3). The weight of single kohlrabi bulbs inthe unfertilised control was signifi cantly lower (39.2%) than in the urea treatment (100%) and the other fertilised treatments. After application of digestate (treatment 3) and mineral fertilisers (treatment 4), the weight of single bulbs significantlyincreased by 18.6 and 25.2%, respectively, compared with the urea treatment (2). The content of ascorbic acid did not diff er among the all four treatments (274-291 mg/kg). There were signifi cant diff erences between all fertilised trea
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
GD - Hnojení, závlahy, zpracování půdy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
ISSN
1211-8516
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
63
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
787-791
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—