Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43310%2F19%3A43915764" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43310/19:43915764 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216224:14230/19:00110006

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103" target="_blank" >10.34135/sjps.190103</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The paper is focused on how the &quot;migration crisis&quot; starting in 2015 in Europe have reshaped the attitude to the European level of border protection. The basic question is how different are the competences of European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EBCG) from the previous FRONTEX and what was the role sovereignty played in it. The paper has a character of a qualitative study where the authors compare the proposal for EBCG, mainly its Article 18 establishing the &quot;right to intervene&quot; in the proposal, with the final version of the document and analyzes the position of the Member states based on their posititions within the Council to the parts of the proposal that were most connected to sovereignty. The analysis is based on data collection from officials from various member states that were part of the negotiations. Apart from this &quot;hidden agenda&quot; the authors also analyze public statements by high-ranking government officials that often commented on the proposal.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The paper is focused on how the &quot;migration crisis&quot; starting in 2015 in Europe have reshaped the attitude to the European level of border protection. The basic question is how different are the competences of European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EBCG) from the previous FRONTEX and what was the role sovereignty played in it. The paper has a character of a qualitative study where the authors compare the proposal for EBCG, mainly its Article 18 establishing the &quot;right to intervene&quot; in the proposal, with the final version of the document and analyzes the position of the Member states based on their posititions within the Council to the parts of the proposal that were most connected to sovereignty. The analysis is based on data collection from officials from various member states that were part of the negotiations. Apart from this &quot;hidden agenda&quot; the authors also analyze public statements by high-ranking government officials that often commented on the proposal.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Slovak Journal of Political Sciences

  • ISSN

    1335-9096

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    19

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    SK - Slovenská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    43-59

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85066614852