To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43310%2F19%3A43915764" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43310/19:43915764 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14230/19:00110006
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190103" target="_blank" >10.34135/sjps.190103</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper is focused on how the "migration crisis" starting in 2015 in Europe have reshaped the attitude to the European level of border protection. The basic question is how different are the competences of European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EBCG) from the previous FRONTEX and what was the role sovereignty played in it. The paper has a character of a qualitative study where the authors compare the proposal for EBCG, mainly its Article 18 establishing the "right to intervene" in the proposal, with the final version of the document and analyzes the position of the Member states based on their posititions within the Council to the parts of the proposal that were most connected to sovereignty. The analysis is based on data collection from officials from various member states that were part of the negotiations. Apart from this "hidden agenda" the authors also analyze public statements by high-ranking government officials that often commented on the proposal.
Název v anglickém jazyce
To intervene or not to intervene? Positions of the member states towards the article 18 of the european border and coast guard proposal
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper is focused on how the "migration crisis" starting in 2015 in Europe have reshaped the attitude to the European level of border protection. The basic question is how different are the competences of European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EBCG) from the previous FRONTEX and what was the role sovereignty played in it. The paper has a character of a qualitative study where the authors compare the proposal for EBCG, mainly its Article 18 establishing the "right to intervene" in the proposal, with the final version of the document and analyzes the position of the Member states based on their posititions within the Council to the parts of the proposal that were most connected to sovereignty. The analysis is based on data collection from officials from various member states that were part of the negotiations. Apart from this "hidden agenda" the authors also analyze public statements by high-ranking government officials that often commented on the proposal.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences
ISSN
1335-9096
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
19
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
43-59
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85066614852