Where Were the Voters? A Spatial Analysis of the 2019 Slovak Presidential Election
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43310%2F20%3A43919245" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43310/20:43919245 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11230/20:10422418 RIV/61989592:15210/20:73605504
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200201" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200201</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200201" target="_blank" >10.34135/sjps.200201</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Where Were the Voters? A Spatial Analysis of the 2019 Slovak Presidential Election
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper endeavours to deliver a comprehensive spatial depiction of Slovakia's presidential election held on 16th and 30th March 2019. At first, the text briefly considers electoral and institutional framework of presidential elections and its background. Within the context of the first round, the paper subsequently analyses the electoral support of four key candidates who had obtained at least 10 per cent in order to clarify the overall electoral support. At the municipal level, the analysis of aggregated data then brings a complex mapping of regional electoral support towards the presidential candidates. Our negative binomial regression models, based on socio-economic variables and the results of the 2016 parliamentary election, yield no satisfactory results. Nonetheless, among others, it was revealed that the final two contenders did not lose their voters from the previous round. In comparison to Šefčovič, Čaputová succeeded in acquiring lower levels of new electoral support (up to 20 per cent) but across the whole country. Afterwards, the Hungarian minority was proved a determinative factor for the win, contrarily to the socio-economic indicators as explicative variables of which the university degree and age were found the most significant.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Where Were the Voters? A Spatial Analysis of the 2019 Slovak Presidential Election
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper endeavours to deliver a comprehensive spatial depiction of Slovakia's presidential election held on 16th and 30th March 2019. At first, the text briefly considers electoral and institutional framework of presidential elections and its background. Within the context of the first round, the paper subsequently analyses the electoral support of four key candidates who had obtained at least 10 per cent in order to clarify the overall electoral support. At the municipal level, the analysis of aggregated data then brings a complex mapping of regional electoral support towards the presidential candidates. Our negative binomial regression models, based on socio-economic variables and the results of the 2016 parliamentary election, yield no satisfactory results. Nonetheless, among others, it was revealed that the final two contenders did not lose their voters from the previous round. In comparison to Šefčovič, Čaputová succeeded in acquiring lower levels of new electoral support (up to 20 per cent) but across the whole country. Afterwards, the Hungarian minority was proved a determinative factor for the win, contrarily to the socio-economic indicators as explicative variables of which the university degree and age were found the most significant.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences
ISSN
1335-9096
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
30
Strana od-do
176-205
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85100078080