Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents' human well-being differently? --A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43310%2F25%3A43927404" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43310/25:43927404 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents' human well-being differently? --A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being is critical for sustainable development. However, ES are often quantified in either resident-perceived or model-measured perspective, whether this would cause a difference in its relationship with human well-being is poorly understood. By integrating biophysical models and household surveys, we used the method of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to compare how perceived (resident-based) and calculated (model-based) ES influence human well-being in China&apos;s Guanting Reservoir basin. Results revealed that provisioning services consistently enhanced human well-being in both perspectives, with influence coefficients ranging from 0.134 to 0.222. Discrepancies emerged in pathways among regulating, supporting, and cultural services, as residents&apos; perceptions contradicted the results derived from calculated ES. These differences highlight the gap between public perception shaped by socio-cultural narratives and biophysical realities, and emphasize the need for multi-perspective approaches in the valuation of ES to align with residents&apos; well-being.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents' human well-being differently? --A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China

Popis výsledku anglicky

Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being is critical for sustainable development. However, ES are often quantified in either resident-perceived or model-measured perspective, whether this would cause a difference in its relationship with human well-being is poorly understood. By integrating biophysical models and household surveys, we used the method of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to compare how perceived (resident-based) and calculated (model-based) ES influence human well-being in China&apos;s Guanting Reservoir basin. Results revealed that provisioning services consistently enhanced human well-being in both perspectives, with influence coefficients ranging from 0.134 to 0.222. Discrepancies emerged in pathways among regulating, supporting, and cultural services, as residents&apos; perceptions contradicted the results derived from calculated ES. These differences highlight the gap between public perception shaped by socio-cultural narratives and biophysical realities, and emphasize the need for multi-perspective approaches in the valuation of ES to align with residents&apos; well-being.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10508 - Physical geography

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Applied Geography

ISSN

0143-6228

e-ISSN

1873-7730

Svazek periodika

184

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

November

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

103765

Kód UT WoS článku

001568709800002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105014760531