Conventional compressive strength parallel to the grain and mechanical resistance of wood against pin penetration and microdrilling established by in-situ semidestructive devices
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F15%3A43906784" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/15:43906784 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68378297:_____/15:00431836
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617%2Fs11527-014-0392-6.pdf" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617%2Fs11527-014-0392-6.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0392-6" target="_blank" >10.1617/s11527-014-0392-6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Conventional compressive strength parallel to the grain and mechanical resistance of wood against pin penetration and microdrilling established by in-situ semidestructive devices
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper compares semidestructive and destructive wood testing methods. The semidestructive methods used were pin pushing, screw withdrawal, dynamic pin penetration, microdrilling, and a new construction of a diagnostic device for an in situ timber assessment based on the principle of measuring the conventional strength by means of a small size loading jack in a drilled radial hole of 12 mm in diameter. To examine the differences between the methods, we conducted measurements using four softwood beams, 1-2 m long. The aim was to discern the variability of properties caused by the distribution of structural properties along the radius and the length of beams incorporated in historical constructions of trusses. The accuracy of the prediction of mechanical properties as measured by semidestructive devices was verified using correlations with mechanical properties as established by standard tests in compliance with EU standards. The test results show a very good correlation of conventional strength with wood density and strength established in standard samples in compression parallel to the grain.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Conventional compressive strength parallel to the grain and mechanical resistance of wood against pin penetration and microdrilling established by in-situ semidestructive devices
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper compares semidestructive and destructive wood testing methods. The semidestructive methods used were pin pushing, screw withdrawal, dynamic pin penetration, microdrilling, and a new construction of a diagnostic device for an in situ timber assessment based on the principle of measuring the conventional strength by means of a small size loading jack in a drilled radial hole of 12 mm in diameter. To examine the differences between the methods, we conducted measurements using four softwood beams, 1-2 m long. The aim was to discern the variability of properties caused by the distribution of structural properties along the radius and the length of beams incorporated in historical constructions of trusses. The accuracy of the prediction of mechanical properties as measured by semidestructive devices was verified using correlations with mechanical properties as established by standard tests in compliance with EU standards. The test results show a very good correlation of conventional strength with wood density and strength established in standard samples in compression parallel to the grain.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AL - Umění, architektura, kulturní dědictví
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Materials and Structures
ISSN
1359-5997
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
48
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
10
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
3217-3229
Kód UT WoS článku
000359942300010
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—