Automated Exponential Feedback Weighting method for subtraction of heat losses from sap flow measured by the trunk heat balance method
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F20%3A43918027" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/20:43918027 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1300.11" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1300.11</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1300.11" target="_blank" >10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1300.11</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Automated Exponential Feedback Weighting method for subtraction of heat losses from sap flow measured by the trunk heat balance method
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Removal of heat losses from the measuring point is one of the crucial issues during processing of data from the sap flow sensors, including the trunk heat balance method (THB). Heat losses (here referred to as 'baseline') are usually estimated at the time of presumably no sap flow. Three main issues may decrease the accuracy of the estimation of baseline: (i) existing sap flow in the night, which did not stop due to ongoing night transpiration or xylem refilling, (ii) natural temperature gradients between heated and reference part of the measuring point, and (iii) long-time (i.e. seasonal) changes in the heat losses due to stem growth or changes in the stem heat conductivity. Therefore, neither the estimation of baseline each night, nor its estimation as a lowest value in a specific (i.e. 2-week period) provide the correct result. Experienced used may be able to estimate the baseline manually (taking into consideration i.e. vapor pressure deficit) but this is a subjective and lengthy approach. Here we present an automated baseline subtraction based on 'Exponential Feedback Weighting method'. This method considers the nighttime sap flow, but it also removes outliers due to natural temperature gradients. We compared various averaging intervals of this method for the removal of baseline, from one day (i.e. estimation at every night) to 28 days in a 1-day increments, estimation at the beginning and at the end of the season and manual subtraction by user (considering the weather data). Best results provided 5-days weighting average, which was closest to the manual subtraction, and also provided enough flexibility for changes in baseline due to changes in the stem heat conductance.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Automated Exponential Feedback Weighting method for subtraction of heat losses from sap flow measured by the trunk heat balance method
Popis výsledku anglicky
Removal of heat losses from the measuring point is one of the crucial issues during processing of data from the sap flow sensors, including the trunk heat balance method (THB). Heat losses (here referred to as 'baseline') are usually estimated at the time of presumably no sap flow. Three main issues may decrease the accuracy of the estimation of baseline: (i) existing sap flow in the night, which did not stop due to ongoing night transpiration or xylem refilling, (ii) natural temperature gradients between heated and reference part of the measuring point, and (iii) long-time (i.e. seasonal) changes in the heat losses due to stem growth or changes in the stem heat conductivity. Therefore, neither the estimation of baseline each night, nor its estimation as a lowest value in a specific (i.e. 2-week period) provide the correct result. Experienced used may be able to estimate the baseline manually (taking into consideration i.e. vapor pressure deficit) but this is a subjective and lengthy approach. Here we present an automated baseline subtraction based on 'Exponential Feedback Weighting method'. This method considers the nighttime sap flow, but it also removes outliers due to natural temperature gradients. We compared various averaging intervals of this method for the removal of baseline, from one day (i.e. estimation at every night) to 28 days in a 1-day increments, estimation at the beginning and at the end of the season and manual subtraction by user (considering the weather data). Best results provided 5-days weighting average, which was closest to the manual subtraction, and also provided enough flexibility for changes in baseline due to changes in the stem heat conductance.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10611 - Plant sciences, botany
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Acta Horticulturae 1300
ISBN
978-94-6261-298-3
ISSN
0567-7572
e-ISSN
2406-6168
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
81-88
Název nakladatele
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
Místo vydání
Leuven
Místo konání akce
Hyytiälä
Datum konání akce
7. 10. 2019
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000711432900011