Comparison of ips cembrae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) capture methods: Small trap trees caught the most beetles

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F20%3A43918910" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/20:43918910 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41320/20:85006

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121275" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121275</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f11121275" target="_blank" >10.3390/f11121275</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of ips cembrae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) capture methods: Small trap trees caught the most beetles

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Ips cembrae is the most important bark beetle pest of larches and has had several local outbreaks in recent decades in Europe. In this study, we compared the numbers of I. cembrae captured by pyramid-trap piles, trap trees, pheromone traps, and poisoned and baited tripods. We also studied how the properties of trap trees and trap logs (volume, sun exposure, and position relative to the ground once deployed) affected the trapping of I. cembrae. We found that both sexes avoided infestation at the bottom of the logs and more than 15 times the number of beetles were captured by traditional trap trees than by pheromone traps or baited and insecticide-treated tripods. The number of I. cembrae per trap tree did not decrease with trap volume; therefore, it is appropriate to use traps of small dimensions. Baited tripods, pyramid-trap piles, and pheromone traps could be useful for detection of the beginning of flight activity, but trap trees are the most useful for reducing I. cembrae numbers.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of ips cembrae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) capture methods: Small trap trees caught the most beetles

Popis výsledku anglicky

Ips cembrae is the most important bark beetle pest of larches and has had several local outbreaks in recent decades in Europe. In this study, we compared the numbers of I. cembrae captured by pyramid-trap piles, trap trees, pheromone traps, and poisoned and baited tripods. We also studied how the properties of trap trees and trap logs (volume, sun exposure, and position relative to the ground once deployed) affected the trapping of I. cembrae. We found that both sexes avoided infestation at the bottom of the logs and more than 15 times the number of beetles were captured by traditional trap trees than by pheromone traps or baited and insecticide-treated tripods. The number of I. cembrae per trap tree did not decrease with trap volume; therefore, it is appropriate to use traps of small dimensions. Baited tripods, pyramid-trap piles, and pheromone traps could be useful for detection of the beginning of flight activity, but trap trees are the most useful for reducing I. cembrae numbers.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40102 - Forestry

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QK1920433" target="_blank" >QK1920433: Vliv obranných opatření na populace lýkožroutů v závislosti na populačních hustotách</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Forests

ISSN

1999-4907

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

1275

Kód UT WoS článku

000602110700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85097254212