Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Airborne Light Detection and Ranging Technologies to Identifying Terrain Obstacles and Designing Access Solutions for the Interior Parts of Forest Stands

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F25%3A43926980" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/25:43926980 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f16050729" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/f16050729</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f16050729" target="_blank" >10.3390/f16050729</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Airborne Light Detection and Ranging Technologies to Identifying Terrain Obstacles and Designing Access Solutions for the Interior Parts of Forest Stands

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We applied UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) and ALS (Airborne Laser Scanning) remote sensing methods to identify terrain obstacles encountered during timber extraction in the skidding process with the aim of proposing accessibility solutions to the inner parts of forest stands using skidding trails. At the Vítovický žleb site, located east of Brno in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic, we analysed the accuracy of digital terrain models (DTMs) created from UAV LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), RGB (Red-Green-Blue) UAV, ALS data taken on site and publicly available LiDAR data DMR 5G (Digital Model of Relief of the Czech Republic, 5th Generation, based on airborne laser scanning, providing pre-classified ground points with an average density of 1 point/m2). UAV data were obtained using two types of drones: a DJI Mavic 2 mounted with an RGB photogrammetric camera and a GeoSLAM Horizon laser scanner on a DJI M600 Pro hexacopter. We achieved the best accuracy with UAV technologies, with an average deviation of 0.06 m, compared to 0.20 m and 0.71 m for ALS and DMR 5G, respectively. The RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) values further confirm the differences in accuracy, with UAV-based models reaching as low as 0.71 m compared to over 1.0 m for ALS and DMR 5G. The results demonstrated that UAVs are well-suited for detailed analysis of rugged terrain morphology and obstacle identification during timber extraction, potentially replacing physical terrain surveys for timber extraction planning. Meanwhile, ALS and DMR 5G data showed significant potential for use in planning the placement of skidding trails and determining the direction and length of timber extraction from logging sites to forest roads, primarily due to their ability to cover large areas effectively. Differences in the analysis results obtained using GIS (Geographic Information System) cost surface solutions applied to ALS and DMR 5G data DTMs were evident on logging sites with terrain obstacles, where the site-specific ALS data proved to be more precise. While DMR 5G is based on ALS data, its generalised nature results in lower accuracy, making site-specific ALS data preferable for analysing rugged terrain and planning timber extractions. However, DMR 5G remains suitable for use in more uniform terrain without obstacles. Thus, we recommend combining UAV and ALS technologies for terrain with obstacles, as we found this approach optimal for efficiently planning the logging-transport process.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Airborne Light Detection and Ranging Technologies to Identifying Terrain Obstacles and Designing Access Solutions for the Interior Parts of Forest Stands

Popis výsledku anglicky

We applied UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) and ALS (Airborne Laser Scanning) remote sensing methods to identify terrain obstacles encountered during timber extraction in the skidding process with the aim of proposing accessibility solutions to the inner parts of forest stands using skidding trails. At the Vítovický žleb site, located east of Brno in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic, we analysed the accuracy of digital terrain models (DTMs) created from UAV LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), RGB (Red-Green-Blue) UAV, ALS data taken on site and publicly available LiDAR data DMR 5G (Digital Model of Relief of the Czech Republic, 5th Generation, based on airborne laser scanning, providing pre-classified ground points with an average density of 1 point/m2). UAV data were obtained using two types of drones: a DJI Mavic 2 mounted with an RGB photogrammetric camera and a GeoSLAM Horizon laser scanner on a DJI M600 Pro hexacopter. We achieved the best accuracy with UAV technologies, with an average deviation of 0.06 m, compared to 0.20 m and 0.71 m for ALS and DMR 5G, respectively. The RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) values further confirm the differences in accuracy, with UAV-based models reaching as low as 0.71 m compared to over 1.0 m for ALS and DMR 5G. The results demonstrated that UAVs are well-suited for detailed analysis of rugged terrain morphology and obstacle identification during timber extraction, potentially replacing physical terrain surveys for timber extraction planning. Meanwhile, ALS and DMR 5G data showed significant potential for use in planning the placement of skidding trails and determining the direction and length of timber extraction from logging sites to forest roads, primarily due to their ability to cover large areas effectively. Differences in the analysis results obtained using GIS (Geographic Information System) cost surface solutions applied to ALS and DMR 5G data DTMs were evident on logging sites with terrain obstacles, where the site-specific ALS data proved to be more precise. While DMR 5G is based on ALS data, its generalised nature results in lower accuracy, making site-specific ALS data preferable for analysing rugged terrain and planning timber extractions. However, DMR 5G remains suitable for use in more uniform terrain without obstacles. Thus, we recommend combining UAV and ALS technologies for terrain with obstacles, as we found this approach optimal for efficiently planning the logging-transport process.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40102 - Forestry

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Forests

ISSN

1999-4907

e-ISSN

1999-4907

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

729

Kód UT WoS článku

001496073600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105006775549