Mechanized Grape Harvest Efficiency

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43510%2F21%3A43919832" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43510/21:43919832 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104621" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104621</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11104621" target="_blank" >10.3390/app11104621</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Mechanized Grape Harvest Efficiency

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Due to the low number of employees and the time limit in the field of grape harvesting, wefocused in the presented article on evaluating the effectiveness of the deployment of an outboardgrape harvester within the conditions of Slovak viticulture. The vineyards are in the Nitra wine-growing region on the southwestern slopes behind the Pivnica Radošina company, Piešt&apos;any district,in a total area of 33 ha. The object of the research was a PELLENC 8090 Selective Process trailed grapeharvester aggregated with a SAME Frutteto3 100 tractor. The mechanized harvesting was testedin the vineyards of Pivnica Radošina s. r. on three selected varieties (Pinot Gris, Pinot Blanc, andTramin Red) for two years. Entry conditions, technical parameters of the equipment, and weatherconditions were monitored for all varieties. Data were analyzed with STATISTICA statistical software.As part of the research, post-harvest losses due to mechanized harvesting were monitored. Theaverage losses for all examined varieties reached the value of 2.17% in 2018, and the value of 2.25%in 2017. A significant output was the efficiency of the deployment of the set for mechanized grapeharvesting, where in 2018 a minimum value of 146.3 ha was set (the average cost of grapes was500 Euro.tMINUS SIGN 1). A significant part of the cost was fixed items, as a two-year tractor and a trailedcollector (for 2017) were used for mechanized harvesting. The difference compared to previousresearch was the deployment of a completely new set during a two-year period on varieties thathave not yet been evaluated. The economic efficiency over two years was elaborated in detail, whichhighlighted the benefits of multi-annual use. In terms of examining losses, differences were shownnot only between varieties, but also between years, and these data were statistically verified. Thepaper evaluates the dependence of the use of mechanized harvesting on changes in the purchaseprice of grapes (increasing it also exponentially increases the required area) and on changing thehourly wage of an employee (increasing it degressively reduces the required area). From the results itcan be said that statistically and economically significant outputs were achieved for the deploymentof machine collection.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Mechanized Grape Harvest Efficiency

Popis výsledku anglicky

Due to the low number of employees and the time limit in the field of grape harvesting, wefocused in the presented article on evaluating the effectiveness of the deployment of an outboardgrape harvester within the conditions of Slovak viticulture. The vineyards are in the Nitra wine-growing region on the southwestern slopes behind the Pivnica Radošina company, Piešt&apos;any district,in a total area of 33 ha. The object of the research was a PELLENC 8090 Selective Process trailed grapeharvester aggregated with a SAME Frutteto3 100 tractor. The mechanized harvesting was testedin the vineyards of Pivnica Radošina s. r. on three selected varieties (Pinot Gris, Pinot Blanc, andTramin Red) for two years. Entry conditions, technical parameters of the equipment, and weatherconditions were monitored for all varieties. Data were analyzed with STATISTICA statistical software.As part of the research, post-harvest losses due to mechanized harvesting were monitored. Theaverage losses for all examined varieties reached the value of 2.17% in 2018, and the value of 2.25%in 2017. A significant output was the efficiency of the deployment of the set for mechanized grapeharvesting, where in 2018 a minimum value of 146.3 ha was set (the average cost of grapes was500 Euro.tMINUS SIGN 1). A significant part of the cost was fixed items, as a two-year tractor and a trailedcollector (for 2017) were used for mechanized harvesting. The difference compared to previousresearch was the deployment of a completely new set during a two-year period on varieties thathave not yet been evaluated. The economic efficiency over two years was elaborated in detail, whichhighlighted the benefits of multi-annual use. In terms of examining losses, differences were shownnot only between varieties, but also between years, and these data were statistically verified. Thepaper evaluates the dependence of the use of mechanized harvesting on changes in the purchaseprice of grapes (increasing it also exponentially increases the required area) and on changing thehourly wage of an employee (increasing it degressively reduces the required area). From the results itcan be said that statistically and economically significant outputs were achieved for the deploymentof machine collection.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40105 - Horticulture, viticulture

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Applied Sciences

ISSN

2076-3417

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

4621

Kód UT WoS článku

000662554900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85106893759