Porování tří metod přípravy teplátu pro rutinní detekci viru PBFD a aviárního polyomaviru pomocí jednoduché a nested PCR z klinických vzorků

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16170%2F08%3A00001845" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16170/08:00001845 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of three template preparation methods for routine detection of beak and feather disease virus and avian polyomavirus with single and nested polymerase chain reaction in clinical specimens

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Direct comparisons are important when assessing the value of DNA extraction methods for diagnostic virology as the inhibitors present and the efficiency of extraction vary with the target infectious agent as well as the species and the site from which the clinical sample was obtained. Three DNA extraction methods were compared for routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) in whole blood and feather samples and of avian polyomavirus (APV) in feather samples. Boiling in Chelex 100 Resin was found to be the most sensitive method for detection of BFDV or APV DNA in both feather and blood samples. In combination with nested PCR it enabled detection of BFDV DNA in 13/13 positive whole blood samples and in 22/23 positive feather samples. It also enabled detection of APV in 31/31 samples detected as positive in this study. NucleoSpin kits enabled detection of BFDV DNA in only 9/13 blood samples and in 18/23 feather samples. The lower rate of BFD

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of three template preparation methods for routine detection of beak and feather disease virus and avian polyomavirus with single and nested polymerase chain reaction in clinical specimens

Popis výsledku anglicky

Direct comparisons are important when assessing the value of DNA extraction methods for diagnostic virology as the inhibitors present and the efficiency of extraction vary with the target infectious agent as well as the species and the site from which the clinical sample was obtained. Three DNA extraction methods were compared for routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) in whole blood and feather samples and of avian polyomavirus (APV) in feather samples. Boiling in Chelex 100 Resin was found to be the most sensitive method for detection of BFDV or APV DNA in both feather and blood samples. In combination with nested PCR it enabled detection of BFDV DNA in 13/13 positive whole blood samples and in 22/23 positive feather samples. It also enabled detection of APV in 31/31 samples detected as positive in this study. NucleoSpin kits enabled detection of BFDV DNA in only 9/13 blood samples and in 18/23 feather samples. The lower rate of BFD

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GJ - Choroby a škůdci zvířat, veterinární medicina

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Avian Pathology

ISSN

0307-9457

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000260907600029

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—