Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Effect of Dietary Lupin (Lupinus albus) on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Composition in Broiler Chickens and Ducks

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16270%2F17%3A43875583" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16270/17:43875583 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60460709:41210/17:74117

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/42/2017-CJAS" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/42/2017-CJAS</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/42/2017-CJAS" target="_blank" >10.17221/42/2017-CJAS</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Effect of Dietary Lupin (Lupinus albus) on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Composition in Broiler Chickens and Ducks

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The purpose of the study was to evaluate the amount of raffinose-series oligosaccharides (RSO) in soybean meal (SBM), whole white lupin seed meal (WLM), sunflower meal (SFM), and rapeseed oil meal (ROM) and to determine whether partial or complete dietary WLM replacement affected the numbers of bacteria in selected groups in the microbiota of broiler chickens and ducks without inducing any weight loss. Total counts of anaerobes, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and Escherichia coli in caecal samples from both ducks and broiler chickens, as well as in a crop chyme, in broiler chickens, were determined. Live weights before slaughter were determined. Both broiler chickens and ducks were fed a control diet with SBM (L-0) or diet containing 50% or 100% WLM as a substitute for SBM (groups L-50 and L-100, respectively). In comparison with SBM, WLM contained significantly higher amounts of RSO, and the amounts of oligosaccharides in SFM (1.73 +/- 0.26 g/100 g) and ROM (1.79 +/- 0.14 g/100 g) were negligible compared to those in WLM (8.26 +/- 0.14 g/100 g) and SBM (6.96 +/- 0.21 g/100 g). The inclusion of lupin in chicken diets did not significantly affect the monitored bacterial groups in crop chyme, but a complete replacement of SBM with WLM (L-100 group) in chicken diets significantly (P &lt;= 0.05) increased the counts of lactobacilli in caecal samples. Partial (L-50 group) and complete (L-100 group) lupin supplementation in the duck diet significantly (P &lt;= 0.05) increased counts of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria by at least one order of magnitude. E. coli counts in poultry were not affected by changes in diet. The results of our study indicate that partial dietary replacement of SBM with WLM did not significantly affect the live weight of broiler chickens and ducks, but that complete replacement of SBM with WLM may lead to weight loss.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Effect of Dietary Lupin (Lupinus albus) on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Composition in Broiler Chickens and Ducks

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The purpose of the study was to evaluate the amount of raffinose-series oligosaccharides (RSO) in soybean meal (SBM), whole white lupin seed meal (WLM), sunflower meal (SFM), and rapeseed oil meal (ROM) and to determine whether partial or complete dietary WLM replacement affected the numbers of bacteria in selected groups in the microbiota of broiler chickens and ducks without inducing any weight loss. Total counts of anaerobes, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and Escherichia coli in caecal samples from both ducks and broiler chickens, as well as in a crop chyme, in broiler chickens, were determined. Live weights before slaughter were determined. Both broiler chickens and ducks were fed a control diet with SBM (L-0) or diet containing 50% or 100% WLM as a substitute for SBM (groups L-50 and L-100, respectively). In comparison with SBM, WLM contained significantly higher amounts of RSO, and the amounts of oligosaccharides in SFM (1.73 +/- 0.26 g/100 g) and ROM (1.79 +/- 0.14 g/100 g) were negligible compared to those in WLM (8.26 +/- 0.14 g/100 g) and SBM (6.96 +/- 0.21 g/100 g). The inclusion of lupin in chicken diets did not significantly affect the monitored bacterial groups in crop chyme, but a complete replacement of SBM with WLM (L-100 group) in chicken diets significantly (P &lt;= 0.05) increased the counts of lactobacilli in caecal samples. Partial (L-50 group) and complete (L-100 group) lupin supplementation in the duck diet significantly (P &lt;= 0.05) increased counts of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria by at least one order of magnitude. E. coli counts in poultry were not affected by changes in diet. The results of our study indicate that partial dietary replacement of SBM with WLM did not significantly affect the live weight of broiler chickens and ducks, but that complete replacement of SBM with WLM may lead to weight loss.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    40201 - Animal and dairy science; (Animal biotechnology to be 4.4)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/QJ1510136" target="_blank" >QJ1510136: Optimalizace proteinové výživy monogastrických zvířat na bázi odrůd semen lupiny bílé (Lupinus albus)</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Czech Journal of Animal Science

  • ISSN

    1212-1819

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    62

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    9

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    369-376

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000408236500002

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus