An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16370%2F20%3A43879033" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16370/20:43879033 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14160/20:00118261 RIV/00023728:_____/20:N0000008

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article-abstract/59/12/3858/5855643?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article-abstract/59/12/3858/5855643?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa072" target="_blank" >10.1093/rheumatology/keaa072</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective. The objective of this study was to investigate whether diacerein has comparable efficacy with celecoxib in pain reduction for treatment in symptomatic knee OA patients. Methods. This randomized double-blind multicentre non-inferiority trial evaluated diacerein vs celecoxib treatment in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 and pain scoring &gt;= 4 (10-cm VAS). Patients were randomized to 6 months of treatment with diacerein 50 mg (n = 1 87) once daily for 1 month and twice daily thereafter, or celecoxib 200mg (n =193) once daily. The primary outcome was the change in WOMAC pain score (0-50 cm) at 6 months, and the secondary outcomes were WOMAC sub-scores, VAS pain score, and the OMERACT-OARSI responder rate. Results. In the per protocol population, the adjusted mean change from baseline in the WOMAC pain score was -11.1 (0.9) with diacerein (n = 1 40) and -11.8(0.9) with celecoxib (n = 1 48). The intergroup difference was 0.7 (95% CI: -1.8, 3.2; P = 0.597), meeting the non-inferiority margin. Supportive analysis of the intention-to-treat population gave similar results. Other outcomes showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low and balanced between groups, but a greater incidence of diarrhoea occurred with diacerein (10.2% vs 3.7%). Diarrhoea was considered mild-to-moderate in all but one case with complete resolution. Conclusions. Diacerein was non-inferior to celecoxib in reducing knee OA pain and improving physical function. Diacerein also demonstrated a good safety profile.

Název v anglickém jazyce

An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective. The objective of this study was to investigate whether diacerein has comparable efficacy with celecoxib in pain reduction for treatment in symptomatic knee OA patients. Methods. This randomized double-blind multicentre non-inferiority trial evaluated diacerein vs celecoxib treatment in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 and pain scoring &gt;= 4 (10-cm VAS). Patients were randomized to 6 months of treatment with diacerein 50 mg (n = 1 87) once daily for 1 month and twice daily thereafter, or celecoxib 200mg (n =193) once daily. The primary outcome was the change in WOMAC pain score (0-50 cm) at 6 months, and the secondary outcomes were WOMAC sub-scores, VAS pain score, and the OMERACT-OARSI responder rate. Results. In the per protocol population, the adjusted mean change from baseline in the WOMAC pain score was -11.1 (0.9) with diacerein (n = 1 40) and -11.8(0.9) with celecoxib (n = 1 48). The intergroup difference was 0.7 (95% CI: -1.8, 3.2; P = 0.597), meeting the non-inferiority margin. Supportive analysis of the intention-to-treat population gave similar results. Other outcomes showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low and balanced between groups, but a greater incidence of diarrhoea occurred with diacerein (10.2% vs 3.7%). Diarrhoea was considered mild-to-moderate in all but one case with complete resolution. Conclusions. Diacerein was non-inferior to celecoxib in reducing knee OA pain and improving physical function. Diacerein also demonstrated a good safety profile.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Rheumatology

ISSN

1462-0324

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

59

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

3858-3868

Kód UT WoS článku

000606837500054

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—