Analysis of Complex Decisional Situations in Companies with the Support of AHP Extension of Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F13%3A50002117" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/13:50002117 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.ifac-papersonline.net/Detailed/59995.html" target="_blank" >http://www.ifac-papersonline.net/Detailed/59995.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00546" target="_blank" >10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00546</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Analysis of Complex Decisional Situations in Companies with the Support of AHP Extension of Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Decision-making processes are crucial for individuals, groups, and organisations to gain and sustain the competitive advantage. The choice of the most appropriate decision style remains the very complex issue. Weaknesses of the original Vroom-Yetton contingency model, referring to the validity and reliability of the model were addressed by fuzzy decision trees or expert systems utilization. In AHP approach to decision making, priorities of alternatives are derived objectively after subjective judgmentsare made. In practical part, three individual decision making personalities on four different situational cases are exemplified to compare recommendations provided by the contingency tree with subjective preferences of decision makers in AHP model.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Analysis of Complex Decisional Situations in Companies with the Support of AHP Extension of Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model

Popis výsledku anglicky

Decision-making processes are crucial for individuals, groups, and organisations to gain and sustain the competitive advantage. The choice of the most appropriate decision style remains the very complex issue. Weaknesses of the original Vroom-Yetton contingency model, referring to the validity and reliability of the model were addressed by fuzzy decision trees or expert systems utilization. In AHP approach to decision making, priorities of alternatives are derived objectively after subjective judgmentsare made. In practical part, three individual decision making personalities on four different situational cases are exemplified to compare recommendations provided by the contingency tree with subjective preferences of decision makers in AHP model.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA402%2F09%2F0405" target="_blank" >GA402/09/0405: Rozvoj nestandardních optimalizačních metod a jejich aplikace v ekonomii a managementu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Manufacturing modelling, management and control 2013

ISBN

978-3-902823-35-9

ISSN

1474-6670

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

549-554

Název nakladatele

IFAC

Místo vydání

Laxenburg

Místo konání akce

St. Petersburg, Russia

Datum konání akce

19. 6. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—