The difference in understanding of time banking in various contexts
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F15%3A50003488" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/15:50003488 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The difference in understanding of time banking in various contexts
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Time banking, along with many other complementary economy systems, is on the world for few decades by now. There are places and communities where it thrives, and places and communities where it fails. This paper aims to look for differences in understanding of the concept of time banking, from various points of view. The paper utilizes information gathered during past years of research. The main aim is to demonstrate that there are differences between starting up and running a time bank in locations where the concept is known and locations where it is not. The issue is evaluated from both sides, than discussed underlining main elements which are later compared and summed up. Result findings contain discrepancies between both sides and in conclusion there is new direction of research mentioned.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The difference in understanding of time banking in various contexts
Popis výsledku anglicky
Time banking, along with many other complementary economy systems, is on the world for few decades by now. There are places and communities where it thrives, and places and communities where it fails. This paper aims to look for differences in understanding of the concept of time banking, from various points of view. The paper utilizes information gathered during past years of research. The main aim is to demonstrate that there are differences between starting up and running a time bank in locations where the concept is known and locations where it is not. The issue is evaluated from both sides, than discussed underlining main elements which are later compared and summed up. Result findings contain discrepancies between both sides and in conclusion there is new direction of research mentioned.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Rethinking social action (LUMEN 2015)
ISBN
978-88-7587-725-5
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
670-674
Název nakladatele
Medimond
Místo vydání
Bologna
Místo konání akce
Iasi, Rumunsko
Datum konání akce
16. 4. 2015
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—