Dependence of objectivity in basketball game officiating on the number of referees
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F21%3A50018015" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/21:50018015 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/113656" target="_blank" >http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/113656</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc2.45" target="_blank" >10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc2.45</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Dependence of objectivity in basketball game officiating on the number of referees
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim was to evaluate the level of objectivity of basketball game officiating and find out, if there is a significant difference in dependence on the number of referees. The core of the study was to verify the assumption that three-person officiating (3PO) brings higher objectivity in basketball game officiating, compared to two-person officiating (2PO). The problem was solved by empirical, descriptive and causal research with quantitative and qualitative analysis. 60 selected games (30 2PO and 30 3PO) of the top Czech Basketball Federation (CBF) competition were evaluated. The level of objectivity was evaluated by means of these indicators: number of foul calls, number of referees’ mistakes, index of mistakes, and number of offball fouls. The statistical significance of the difference was evaluated in Chi-square test (χ2 , α .05). Qualitative analysis was based on the minimum required criteria according to expert opinions of top league CBF referees (n = 26). The significant difference in the number of foul calls was not confirmed. The results showed significant difference in decrease of number of referees’ mistakes and index of mistakes and in increase of number of off-ball fouls. The findings support the idea of 3PO system to be efficient.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Dependence of objectivity in basketball game officiating on the number of referees
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim was to evaluate the level of objectivity of basketball game officiating and find out, if there is a significant difference in dependence on the number of referees. The core of the study was to verify the assumption that three-person officiating (3PO) brings higher objectivity in basketball game officiating, compared to two-person officiating (2PO). The problem was solved by empirical, descriptive and causal research with quantitative and qualitative analysis. 60 selected games (30 2PO and 30 3PO) of the top Czech Basketball Federation (CBF) competition were evaluated. The level of objectivity was evaluated by means of these indicators: number of foul calls, number of referees’ mistakes, index of mistakes, and number of offball fouls. The statistical significance of the difference was evaluated in Chi-square test (χ2 , α .05). Qualitative analysis was based on the minimum required criteria according to expert opinions of top league CBF referees (n = 26). The significant difference in the number of foul calls was not confirmed. The results showed significant difference in decrease of number of referees’ mistakes and index of mistakes and in increase of number of off-ball fouls. The findings support the idea of 3PO system to be efficient.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50901 - Other social sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of human sport and exercise
ISSN
1988-5202
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2proc
Stát vydavatele periodika
ES - Španělské království
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
"S601"-"S609"
Kód UT WoS článku
000681300500045
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—