How does emergency remote teaching affect EFL students' writing skills?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F25%3A50022562" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/25:50022562 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2500001" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2500001</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2500001" target="_blank" >10.1080/2331186X.2025.2500001</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How does emergency remote teaching affect EFL students' writing skills?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Ths is the new abstract: Writing is among the most challenging language skills, and it necessitates memorization and practice. Nevertheless, there has been an increasing interest in research on the difficulties the learners encounter and the solutions to enhance the learners' writing skills. This study aims to scrutinize the mistakes that English Foreign Language (EFL) learners make in their writing, the challenges that arise from their heavy reliance on Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT), and also the potential solutions and suggestions for improving their writing skills. To collect the data, teacher interviews were done in addition to document analysis using a sample of written texts. Written samples of student paper-sheet data were statistically analyzed using frequency and percentage, while teacher interviews from two countries, namely Iraq and the Czech Republic, were evaluated subjectively. The findings show that both groups agreed that writing proficiency is a controversial issue and that it is a skill that is ignored in online courses. It further shows that Czech EFL learners display a lack of grammar, while Iraqi EFL learners show a noticeable shortage in spelling and punctuation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How does emergency remote teaching affect EFL students' writing skills?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Ths is the new abstract: Writing is among the most challenging language skills, and it necessitates memorization and practice. Nevertheless, there has been an increasing interest in research on the difficulties the learners encounter and the solutions to enhance the learners' writing skills. This study aims to scrutinize the mistakes that English Foreign Language (EFL) learners make in their writing, the challenges that arise from their heavy reliance on Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT), and also the potential solutions and suggestions for improving their writing skills. To collect the data, teacher interviews were done in addition to document analysis using a sample of written texts. Written samples of student paper-sheet data were statistically analyzed using frequency and percentage, while teacher interviews from two countries, namely Iraq and the Czech Republic, were evaluated subjectively. The findings show that both groups agreed that writing proficiency is a controversial issue and that it is a skill that is ignored in online courses. It further shows that Czech EFL learners display a lack of grammar, while Iraqi EFL learners show a noticeable shortage in spelling and punctuation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Cogent Education
ISSN
2331-186X
e-ISSN
2331-186X
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
"Article Number: 2500001"
Kód UT WoS článku
001482722100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105004453573