Quantificational accounts of logical consequence I: from Aristotle to Bolzano

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F14%3A50002141" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/14:50002141 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon/?q=en/quantificational-accounts-logical-consequence-i-aristotle-bolzano" target="_blank" >http://klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon/?q=en/quantificational-accounts-logical-consequence-i-aristotle-bolzano</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Quantificational accounts of logical consequence I: from Aristotle to Bolzano

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

So-called quantificational accounts explicate logical consequence or validity as truth-preservation in all cases, cases being construed as admissible substitutional variants or as admissible interpretations with respect to non-logical terms. In the present study, which is the first from three successive studies devoted to quantification accounts, I focus on the beginning of systematic theorizing of consequence in Aristotle´s work, which contains the rudiments of both modal and quantificational accountsof consequence. I argue, inter alia, that there is no evidence for the claim that Aristotle would have subscribed to the latter, and that for a full-fledged quantificational approach in a modern style we need to turn to Bolzano´s substitutional approach,whose motiva-tion, structure and problems are explained in the second part of this study.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Quantificational accounts of logical consequence I: from Aristotle to Bolzano

Popis výsledku anglicky

So-called quantificational accounts explicate logical consequence or validity as truth-preservation in all cases, cases being construed as admissible substitutional variants or as admissible interpretations with respect to non-logical terms. In the present study, which is the first from three successive studies devoted to quantification accounts, I focus on the beginning of systematic theorizing of consequence in Aristotle´s work, which contains the rudiments of both modal and quantificational accountsof consequence. I argue, inter alia, that there is no evidence for the claim that Aristotle would have subscribed to the latter, and that for a full-fledged quantificational approach in a modern style we need to turn to Bolzano´s substitutional approach,whose motiva-tion, structure and problems are explained in the second part of this study.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Organon F : filozofický časopis

ISSN

1335-0668

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

22-44

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—