Fragmentation of presidential elections and governability crises in Latin America: a curvilinear relationship?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F18%3A50014484" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/18:50014484 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2018.1462797?casa_token=O4B0tnxUj5UAAAAA:x-nzHR8hNsctD7tfrLpZ2pvoNxNhA9ugEhGUpoGQ96HEQkCX5DlFpVv0W_emjdn3sd98U53SbJ-Byw" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2018.1462797?casa_token=O4B0tnxUj5UAAAAA:x-nzHR8hNsctD7tfrLpZ2pvoNxNhA9ugEhGUpoGQ96HEQkCX5DlFpVv0W_emjdn3sd98U53SbJ-Byw</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1462797" target="_blank" >10.1080/13510347.2018.1462797</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Fragmentation of presidential elections and governability crises in Latin America: a curvilinear relationship?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Part of the literature views high numbers of presidential candidates as a threat to political stability in presidential democracies. A contradictory model proposes that an overconcentration of the presidential party system is problematic. Both models are hard to reconcile. We approach this puzzle by arguing that the relationship between the level of presidential election fragmentation and governability crises is curvilinear: both very low and very high effective numbers of presidential candidates increase the risk of governability crisis. We test this theoretical claim with ordered logit models drawing on a sample of 108 presidencies in Latin America between 1978 and 2013 and using an ordinal index of the intensity of crisis as the dependent variable. We explore the operation of the theorized causal mechanisms through case studies and argue that they are different at both extremes, high and low levels of fragmentation. Finally, we formulate implications for the design of presidential electoral rules drawing on the debate contrasting runoff and plurality rules.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Fragmentation of presidential elections and governability crises in Latin America: a curvilinear relationship?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Part of the literature views high numbers of presidential candidates as a threat to political stability in presidential democracies. A contradictory model proposes that an overconcentration of the presidential party system is problematic. Both models are hard to reconcile. We approach this puzzle by arguing that the relationship between the level of presidential election fragmentation and governability crises is curvilinear: both very low and very high effective numbers of presidential candidates increase the risk of governability crisis. We test this theoretical claim with ordered logit models drawing on a sample of 108 presidencies in Latin America between 1978 and 2013 and using an ordinal index of the intensity of crisis as the dependent variable. We explore the operation of the theorized causal mechanisms through case studies and argue that they are different at both extremes, high and low levels of fragmentation. Finally, we formulate implications for the design of presidential electoral rules drawing on the debate contrasting runoff and plurality rules.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Democratization
ISSN
1351-0347
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
25
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
1270-1290
Kód UT WoS článku
000439723200011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85045684412