Humans on Top, Humans among the Other Animals: Narratives of Anthropological Difference
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F19%3A50016199" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/19:50016199 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-019-09364-w" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-019-09364-w</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12304-019-09364-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12304-019-09364-w</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Humans on Top, Humans among the Other Animals: Narratives of Anthropological Difference
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The relationship of humans to other primates – both in terms of abilities and evolution - has been an age-old topic of dispute in science. In this paper the claim is made that the different views of authors are based not so much on differences in empirical evidence, but on the ontological stances of the authors and the underlying ground narratives that they use. For comparing and reconciling the views presented by the representatives of, inter alia, cognitive ethology, comparative psychology, and zoosemiotics, an overarching approach of multi-constructivism is introduced. The paper proposes an analytic model (3C/GUTP) that distinguishes four logical possibilities in representing anthropological difference: Gradualism, Transformativism, Unitarism, and Pluralism. Using this typology, the views of C. Darwin, F. de Waal, M. Tomasello, and T. A. Sebeok regarding the similarities and differences between human and animal capacities for cognition, culture and communication (3C) are analyzed. The results indicate systematic differences in the selected narratives by these authors (e.g. Darwin – Gradualism, Tomasello - Transformativism) that can be related to the types of underlying ontologies.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Humans on Top, Humans among the Other Animals: Narratives of Anthropological Difference
Popis výsledku anglicky
The relationship of humans to other primates – both in terms of abilities and evolution - has been an age-old topic of dispute in science. In this paper the claim is made that the different views of authors are based not so much on differences in empirical evidence, but on the ontological stances of the authors and the underlying ground narratives that they use. For comparing and reconciling the views presented by the representatives of, inter alia, cognitive ethology, comparative psychology, and zoosemiotics, an overarching approach of multi-constructivism is introduced. The paper proposes an analytic model (3C/GUTP) that distinguishes four logical possibilities in representing anthropological difference: Gradualism, Transformativism, Unitarism, and Pluralism. Using this typology, the views of C. Darwin, F. de Waal, M. Tomasello, and T. A. Sebeok regarding the similarities and differences between human and animal capacities for cognition, culture and communication (3C) are analyzed. The results indicate systematic differences in the selected narratives by these authors (e.g. Darwin – Gradualism, Tomasello - Transformativism) that can be related to the types of underlying ontologies.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GF17-33808L" target="_blank" >GF17-33808L: Inferencializmus a kolektivní intencionalita</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Biosemiotics
ISSN
1875-1342
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
381-403
Kód UT WoS článku
000491512900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85074772405