Assertion: A Pragmatic Genealogy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F21%3A50018137" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/21:50018137 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003047483-7/assertion-ladislav-kore%C5%88?context=ubx&refId=e4558462-7930-43fd-838c-3abd043c19b0" target="_blank" >https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003047483-7/assertion-ladislav-kore%C5%88?context=ubx&refId=e4558462-7930-43fd-838c-3abd043c19b0</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assertion: A Pragmatic Genealogy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

So-called dialectical approaches offer an attractive account of assertions as embedded in a larger norm-governed practice of reasoned discourse. But their proponents have rarely asked about what function such a practice could have fulfilled in the lives of human beings that could explain why those beings could have elaborated it. In this chapter, I address this challenge by reconstructing a pragmatic genealogy of assertoric practice and its intimate relation to reasoned discourse. Taking inspiration from the recent “state of nature epistemology,” I describe a discursive state of nature inhabited by simple yet already sociable human beings who stand to benefit from coordination, cooperation, and communication. I then reconsider why and how creatures could be under pressure to elaborate a communicative practice with the characteristic features that prominent dialectical accounts attribute to assertions. Finally, I show how that account can accommodate a number of characteristic features—social, normative, epistemic—that assertions might be claimed to have.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assertion: A Pragmatic Genealogy

Popis výsledku anglicky

So-called dialectical approaches offer an attractive account of assertions as embedded in a larger norm-governed practice of reasoned discourse. But their proponents have rarely asked about what function such a practice could have fulfilled in the lives of human beings that could explain why those beings could have elaborated it. In this chapter, I address this challenge by reconstructing a pragmatic genealogy of assertoric practice and its intimate relation to reasoned discourse. Taking inspiration from the recent “state of nature epistemology,” I describe a discursive state of nature inhabited by simple yet already sociable human beings who stand to benefit from coordination, cooperation, and communication. I then reconsider why and how creatures could be under pressure to elaborate a communicative practice with the characteristic features that prominent dialectical accounts attribute to assertions. Finally, I show how that account can accommodate a number of characteristic features—social, normative, epistemic—that assertions might be claimed to have.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX20-05180X" target="_blank" >GX20-05180X: Naturalizovaný inferencializmus: normy, významy a důvody ve světě přírody</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

The Social Institution of Discursive Norms. Historical, Naturalistic, and Pragmatic Perspectives

ISBN

978-1-00-304748-3

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

91-120

Počet stran knihy

288

Název nakladatele

Routledge

Místo vydání

New York

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—