DEKI, Denotation, and the Fortuitous Misuse of Maps
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F22%3A50019746" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/22:50019746 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003202905-24/deki-denotation-fortuitous-misuse-maps-jared-millson-mark-risjord" target="_blank" >https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003202905-24/deki-denotation-fortuitous-misuse-maps-jared-millson-mark-risjord</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003202905-24" target="_blank" >10.4324/9781003202905-24</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
DEKI, Denotation, and the Fortuitous Misuse of Maps
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Unjustified surrogative inferences from maps can sometimes accidentally result in true conclusions. These are instances of what we call the fortuitous misuse of a map. Such phenomena challenge us to distinguish between justified and unjustified surrogative inference—between using and misusing a map. For the DEKI account of epistemic representation, that difference turns, in part, on what the map denotes. This chapter argues that none of the common accounts of denotation helps DEKI distinguish between use and misuse because DEKI gives users too much freedom in their interpretations. DEKI appeals to context as a constraint, so we turn to the methodology of archaeological site mapping to understand how context might help distinguish between map use and misuse. Doing so reveals that the causal links established by map making are determined, in part, by designers’ background knowledge and research questions. Although the result may be a plausible story about how context helps fix denotation, it also shows that users’ entitlement to draw surrogative inferences is established by the epistemic constraints on the mapmakers. Several challenges for DEKI arise from the way in which context distinguishes between justified and unjustified surrogative inferences.
Název v anglickém jazyce
DEKI, Denotation, and the Fortuitous Misuse of Maps
Popis výsledku anglicky
Unjustified surrogative inferences from maps can sometimes accidentally result in true conclusions. These are instances of what we call the fortuitous misuse of a map. Such phenomena challenge us to distinguish between justified and unjustified surrogative inference—between using and misusing a map. For the DEKI account of epistemic representation, that difference turns, in part, on what the map denotes. This chapter argues that none of the common accounts of denotation helps DEKI distinguish between use and misuse because DEKI gives users too much freedom in their interpretations. DEKI appeals to context as a constraint, so we turn to the methodology of archaeological site mapping to understand how context might help distinguish between map use and misuse. Doing so reveals that the causal links established by map making are determined, in part, by designers’ background knowledge and research questions. Although the result may be a plausible story about how context helps fix denotation, it also shows that users’ entitlement to draw surrogative inferences is established by the epistemic constraints on the mapmakers. Several challenges for DEKI arise from the way in which context distinguishes between justified and unjustified surrogative inferences.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GX20-05180X" target="_blank" >GX20-05180X: Naturalizovaný inferencializmus: normy, významy a důvody ve světě přírody</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Scientific Understanding and Representation. Modeling in the Physical Sciences
ISBN
978-1-00-320290-5
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
280-295
Počet stran knihy
428
Název nakladatele
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Místo vydání
New York
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—