The Laws of Thought and the Laws of Truth as Two Sides of One Coin

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F23%3A50019744" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/23:50019744 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10992-022-09673-5.pdf?pdf=button" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10992-022-09673-5.pdf?pdf=button</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09673-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10992-022-09673-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Laws of Thought and the Laws of Truth as Two Sides of One Coin

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Some think that logic concerns the “laws of truth”; others that logic concerns the “laws of thought.” This paper presents a way to reconcile both views by building a bridge between truth-maker theory, `a la Fine, and normative bilateralism, `a la Restall and Ripley. The paper suggests a novel way of understanding consequence in truth- maker theory and shows that this allows us to identify a common structure shared by truth-maker theory and normative bilateralism. We can thus transfer ideas from nor-mative bilateralism to truth-maker theory, such as non-transitive solutions to paradox, and vice versa, such as notions of factual equivalence and containment.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Laws of Thought and the Laws of Truth as Two Sides of One Coin

Popis výsledku anglicky

Some think that logic concerns the “laws of truth”; others that logic concerns the “laws of thought.” This paper presents a way to reconcile both views by building a bridge between truth-maker theory, `a la Fine, and normative bilateralism, `a la Restall and Ripley. The paper suggests a novel way of understanding consequence in truth- maker theory and shows that this allows us to identify a common structure shared by truth-maker theory and normative bilateralism. We can thus transfer ideas from nor-mative bilateralism to truth-maker theory, such as non-transitive solutions to paradox, and vice versa, such as notions of factual equivalence and containment.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX20-05180X" target="_blank" >GX20-05180X: Naturalizovaný inferencializmus: normy, významy a důvody ve světě přírody</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Philosophical Logic

ISSN

0022-3611

e-ISSN

1573-0433

Svazek periodika

52

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

31

Strana od-do

313-343

Kód UT WoS článku

000842894100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85136574213