Inside human practices

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F24%3A50021705" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/24:50021705 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003428794-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003428794-5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003428794-5" target="_blank" >10.4324/9781003428794-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Inside human practices

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

I suggest that we imagine a practice as consisting of two (or more) levels: on the ground level the participants do whatever performances constitute the core of the practice, on the upper level they evaluate each other&apos;s ground-level performances as appropriate or inappropriate, correct or incorrect. In this sense, practices are essentially rule-governed, and the rules do not come from without, but are an integral part of the practices. They are integral to them to such an extent that they need not have the form of explicit prescriptions, they often remain implicit to the actions constituting the practice. The rules tend to interlock into complex edifices, which we can, as it were, enter. We can dwell inside such arenas of rules; and participating in a practice can usually be depicted as just operating within one of such arenas. The thing is that being “inside” usually means being able to carry out actions that are not available “outside”. We live most of our lives within such normative practices (and their solidified forms, institutions), whereby we become not only organisms, which display various kinds of behavior, but rather also persons, who carry out actions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Inside human practices

Popis výsledku anglicky

I suggest that we imagine a practice as consisting of two (or more) levels: on the ground level the participants do whatever performances constitute the core of the practice, on the upper level they evaluate each other&apos;s ground-level performances as appropriate or inappropriate, correct or incorrect. In this sense, practices are essentially rule-governed, and the rules do not come from without, but are an integral part of the practices. They are integral to them to such an extent that they need not have the form of explicit prescriptions, they often remain implicit to the actions constituting the practice. The rules tend to interlock into complex edifices, which we can, as it were, enter. We can dwell inside such arenas of rules; and participating in a practice can usually be depicted as just operating within one of such arenas. The thing is that being “inside” usually means being able to carry out actions that are not available “outside”. We live most of our lives within such normative practices (and their solidified forms, institutions), whereby we become not only organisms, which display various kinds of behavior, but rather also persons, who carry out actions.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX20-05180X" target="_blank" >GX20-05180X: Naturalizovaný inferencializmus: normy, významy a důvody ve světě přírody</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Practice Theory and Law

ISBN

978-1-00-342879-4

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

92-106

Počet stran knihy

424

Název nakladatele

Routledge

Místo vydání

Abingdon, Oxon

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—