Understanding Naturalism With Quine From Within Science and History

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F25%3A50022869" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/25:50022869 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://jhaponline.org/article/view/5908" target="_blank" >https://jhaponline.org/article/view/5908</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v14i3.5908" target="_blank" >10.15173/jhap.v14i3.5908</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Understanding Naturalism With Quine From Within Science and History

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this essay, I present Quine’s fragmented and often forgotten views on writing history. However, this needs to be done in conjunction with an examination of his notion of science as our “total world-picture.” Quine elegantly avoids the task of specifying a demarcation criterion of science. The result is to position science as a Wittgensteinian language game that gradually expanded from its purpose of predicting our experiences and became socio-historically institutionalized set of practices. Thus, this essay has two aims; (i) I analyze Quine’s idiosyncratic, post-positivist concept of science with a particular focus on his inclusion of sciences that are traditionally labeled as soft or social. Then, (ii) I eventually indicate how Quine deals with historical inquiry. When taken together, this essay can also be read as a case study analysis of Quine’s take on all non-experimental modes of scientific inquiry, and, more broadly, his special account of naturalism and pragmatism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Understanding Naturalism With Quine From Within Science and History

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this essay, I present Quine’s fragmented and often forgotten views on writing history. However, this needs to be done in conjunction with an examination of his notion of science as our “total world-picture.” Quine elegantly avoids the task of specifying a demarcation criterion of science. The result is to position science as a Wittgensteinian language game that gradually expanded from its purpose of predicting our experiences and became socio-historically institutionalized set of practices. Thus, this essay has two aims; (i) I analyze Quine’s idiosyncratic, post-positivist concept of science with a particular focus on his inclusion of sciences that are traditionally labeled as soft or social. Then, (ii) I eventually indicate how Quine deals with historical inquiry. When taken together, this essay can also be read as a case study analysis of Quine’s take on all non-experimental modes of scientific inquiry, and, more broadly, his special account of naturalism and pragmatism.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA23-05374S" target="_blank" >GA23-05374S: Nové kontexty filosofické antropologie: Hledání antropologické diference mimo dichotomii příroda/kultura</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy

ISSN

2159-0303

e-ISSN

2159-0303

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CA - Kanada

Počet stran výsledku

32

Strana od-do

1-32

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105022820012