Comparison of the surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F12%3A%230001633" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/12:#0001633 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00209775:_____/12:#0000242

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.02.003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.02.003</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.02.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.02.003</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of the surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

ntroduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved as an alternative method for surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients. Initially the transfemoral (TF) approach was used, later the transapical (TA) approach was adopted as an option for selected patients. The aim of our study was to compare the safety and anatomical and functional success of TAVI procedures with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Material and methods: The study included 45 consecutive high-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis indicated for aortic valve intervention who met the entry criteria (age >75 years; logistic Euroscore >15%). The patients were allocated to one of three groups according the type of procedure: SAVR (n=15), TAVITA (n=15) and TAVI TF (n=15). The groups did not differ in their preoperative characteristics except for myocardial infarction, which was more common in the TAVI groups. The Edwards Sapien valve was implanted in the TAVI patients and Edw

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of the surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

ntroduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved as an alternative method for surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients. Initially the transfemoral (TF) approach was used, later the transapical (TA) approach was adopted as an option for selected patients. The aim of our study was to compare the safety and anatomical and functional success of TAVI procedures with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Material and methods: The study included 45 consecutive high-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis indicated for aortic valve intervention who met the entry criteria (age >75 years; logistic Euroscore >15%). The patients were allocated to one of three groups according the type of procedure: SAVR (n=15), TAVITA (n=15) and TAVI TF (n=15). The groups did not differ in their preoperative characteristics except for myocardial infarction, which was more common in the TAVI groups. The Edwards Sapien valve was implanted in the TAVI patients and Edw

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NS10643" target="_blank" >NS10643: Porovnání klasické a miniinvazivních náhrad aortální chlopně u pacientů ve vysokém věku</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cor et Vasa

ISSN

0010-8650

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

54

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3-4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

119-126

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—