Quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical replacement in High-risk elderly patients
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F12%3A%230001825" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/12:#0001825 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00209775:_____/13:#0000248 RIV/00216224:14110/13:00070304 RIV/65269705:_____/13:#0002048 RIV/00159816:_____/13:00060725
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.062" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.062</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.062" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2012.062</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical replacement in High-risk elderly patients
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical replacement (SAVR) at one year. Methods: The study included 45 consecutive high-risk patients (average age 82.0 years; logistic Euroscore 22.3%) with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis allocated to TAVI transfemoral, TAVI transapical using the Edwards-Sapien valve or SAVR with the Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (n=15 in each). The pre-operative characteristics were similar except for more myocardial infarctions in TAVI. The quality of life was assessed using the standardized EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline and on days 30, 90 and 360. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee and an informed consent was signed. Atotal of 7 patients (15.5%) died during follow-up. Results: At baseline no significant differences in any of the quality-of-life parameters were found except for usual activities described as ?best? (46.7% in SAVR vs. 10.0% in TAVI; P=0.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical replacement in High-risk elderly patients
Popis výsledku anglicky
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical replacement (SAVR) at one year. Methods: The study included 45 consecutive high-risk patients (average age 82.0 years; logistic Euroscore 22.3%) with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis allocated to TAVI transfemoral, TAVI transapical using the Edwards-Sapien valve or SAVR with the Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (n=15 in each). The pre-operative characteristics were similar except for more myocardial infarctions in TAVI. The quality of life was assessed using the standardized EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline and on days 30, 90 and 360. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee and an informed consent was signed. Atotal of 7 patients (15.5%) died during follow-up. Results: At baseline no significant differences in any of the quality-of-life parameters were found except for usual activities described as ?best? (46.7% in SAVR vs. 10.0% in TAVI; P=0.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NS10643" target="_blank" >NS10643: Porovnání klasické a miniinvazivních náhrad aortální chlopně u pacientů ve vysokém věku</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc
ISSN
1213-8118
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
156
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2012
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
1-6
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—