Velkoplošná chráněná území a regionální rozvoj (případová studie z České republiky)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F05%3A00024402" target="_blank" >RIV/67179843:_____/05:00024402 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Protected landscape areas and regional development (the case of the Czech Republic)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating the level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas where it is applied. We used three large-scale Czech protected areas and tested the hypothesis saying that areas underspecial regime of management due to nature protection suffer from economic underdevelopment. Based on the analysis both of objective data and subjective reflection of the situation by local population we can conclude that protected areas should not be seen as territories a priori handicapped.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Protected landscape areas and regional development (the case of the Czech Republic)

Popis výsledku anglicky

The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating the level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas where it is applied. We used three large-scale Czech protected areas and tested the hypothesis saying that areas underspecial regime of management due to nature protection suffer from economic underdevelopment. Based on the analysis both of objective data and subjective reflection of the situation by local population we can conclude that protected areas should not be seen as territories a priori handicapped.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2005

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Rural Development Capacity in Carpathian Europe

ISBN

83-89666-11-1

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

23-36

Počet stran knihy

—

Název nakladatele

Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw,

Místo vydání

Warsaw

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—