Ochrana přírody a socio-ekonomický rozvoj ve vybraných chráněných krajinných oblastech

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F05%3A00043921" target="_blank" >RIV/67179843:_____/05:00043921 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Nature protection and socio-economic development in selected protected landscape areas

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Protected landscape areas are primarily aimed to conserve nature on their territory. In Central Europe, areas having a status of being protected cannot be considered pristine landscapes. On the contrary, they are cultural landscapes having passed centurylong cultivation by human activities. Furthermore, they have been permanently populated. As a result nature protection measures should count with needs of local population in order not to make areas under protection a priori disadvantaged from socio-economic viewpoint. There is still open question if such a balance can be ever achieved. The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief as to that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas

Název v anglickém jazyce

Nature protection and socio-economic development in selected protected landscape areas

Popis výsledku anglicky

Protected landscape areas are primarily aimed to conserve nature on their territory. In Central Europe, areas having a status of being protected cannot be considered pristine landscapes. On the contrary, they are cultural landscapes having passed centurylong cultivation by human activities. Furthermore, they have been permanently populated. As a result nature protection measures should count with needs of local population in order not to make areas under protection a priori disadvantaged from socio-economic viewpoint. There is still open question if such a balance can be ever achieved. The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief as to that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DO - Ochrana krajinných území

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/SM%2F610%2F3%2F03" target="_blank" >SM/610/3/03: Participativní management chráněných oblastí - klíč k minimalizaci konfliktů mezi ochranou biodiversity a socioekonomickým rozvojem místních komunit</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2005

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ekológia

ISSN

1335-342X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

109-123

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—