Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity. A cross-national comparison

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F12%3A00381938" target="_blank" >RIV/67179843:_____/12:00381938 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11690/12:10118685

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.008</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.008</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity. A cross-national comparison

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity have been compared with several commonly used environmental indices measuring various aspects of ecological sustainability and biodiversity. We found that the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity are closely related especially to the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). On the other hand, the Ecological Footprint is negatively related to other measures of ecosystem health and biodiversity such as the Ecosystem Wellbeing Index (EWI). We exploredpatterns of correlation between the Ecological Footprint and ecosystem and biodiversity measures, including threatened species numbers. Our results support previous findings that human economic activity and environmental pressures are related to threatsto biodiversity. This analysis provides evidence that the Ecological Footprint is a meaningful ecological indicator which can be compared to equivalent measures of the appropriation of ecosystem productive capacity and land use pressures.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity. A cross-national comparison

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity have been compared with several commonly used environmental indices measuring various aspects of ecological sustainability and biodiversity. We found that the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity are closely related especially to the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). On the other hand, the Ecological Footprint is negatively related to other measures of ecosystem health and biodiversity such as the Ecosystem Wellbeing Index (EWI). We exploredpatterns of correlation between the Ecological Footprint and ecosystem and biodiversity measures, including threatened species numbers. Our results support previous findings that human economic activity and environmental pressures are related to threatsto biodiversity. This analysis provides evidence that the Ecological Footprint is a meaningful ecological indicator which can be compared to equivalent measures of the appropriation of ecosystem productive capacity and land use pressures.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EH - Ekologie – společenstva

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ecological Indicators

ISSN

1470-160X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

SI

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

40-46

Kód UT WoS článku

000299984700006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—